<text y="1050">EB Garamond Initials</text><text x="300" y="1050" font-family="EB Garamond Initials">ADFGLNOQTXo</text>
<text y="1075">EB Garamond Initials Fill1</text><text x="300" y="1075" font-family="EB Garamond Initials Fill1">AFGLNOQTXo</text>
<text y="1100">EB Garamond Initials Fill2</text><text x="300" y="1100" font-family="EB Garamond Initials Fill2">AFGLNOQTXo</text>

is probably why EB Garamond Initials is only rendering ADFGLNOQTXo.

@JoKalliauer

so the package that includes Nuosu SIL in Debian is fonts-sil-nuosusil.

I just checked ALL our production servers via our debmonitor tool and _ALL_ 314 servers having this font package have the exact same version, 2.1.1-8. Which is simply what is in Debian stable.

There is no difference between different servers that could explain different rendering results, if those files were rendered at the same time.

that being said... since I see T218828 and that mentions a tool in toolforge. Now that would make much more sense if the difference is between production servers and toolforge. In that case it is a request for the toolforge team to look into the font list there and match it with production, maybe.

In T280721#7022037, @Dzahn wrote:

There is no difference between different servers that could explain different rendering results, if those files were rendered at the same time.

That sounds logical, but I do not know why they are different, maybe I just oversee something, similar to the previous post by @AntiCompositeNumber.

The last version of both files are from today, and I used action=purge, so they are rendered within 5minutes, and also emptied my cache.

Is it possible that you are comparing files rendered on production servers vs. files rendered on toolforge?