Under the "advanced options" section, at the third option ("Use non-JavaScript interface"), the small text under reads: "Loads RecentChanges without filters search or highlighting functionality.". This should be corrected to "Loads RecentChanges without filters, search or highlighting functionality.".
Description
Details
| Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCFilters: Make preference help string more broadly applicable | mediawiki/core | master | +1 -1 |
Event Timeline
I believe that this label might be intentionally talking about the "filters search" functionality. Tagging with the relevant project; this isn't an issue with the preferences system.
@MMiller_WMF @Trizek-WMF we added this message a while back. Does the proposed change look OK to you?
Hmm, if it is so, then perhaps correcting it to "filter search" would be appropriate?
Yeah, you can search for a given filter. I let native English speakers decide on the right way to explain it. :)
While we are here, if we are correcting this sentence, we should cover the fact that is is also covering Special:Watchlist and Special:RecentChangesLinked. And probably other pages in the future. Maybe we should have something more neutral and capable of dealing with the diversity of the usages?
OK, so how about:
Loads RecentChanges, Watchlist, and similar pages without the filtered search or the highlighting functionality.
?
Change 697716 had a related patch set uploaded (by Kosta Harlan; author: Kosta Harlan):
[mediawiki/core@master] RCFilters: Make preference help string more broadly applicable
Change 697716 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/core@master] RCFilters: Make preference help string more broadly applicable
Um, actually, if it's fine, I'd suggest a clarification to this:
Loads RecentChanges, Watchlist, and similar pages without the filtered search or highlighting functionality.
I think this makes it clearer and more concise.
I intentionally re-injected the definite article to clarify that the highlighting functionality is distinguishable from the search functionality, especially for non-English translations, but perhaps?