Page MenuHomePhabricator

Add a link: change the edit summary
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

We have observed some feedback from various communities about the lack of understanding of what newcomers are doing. Experienced users thought that the edit summary was written by the user, and they warned them against doing it. This may happen when we will scale.

The new structure would be Link suggestions feature: 4 links added.

If only one link is added, it should say link singular.

This would include:

Event Timeline

@Trizek-WMF @Dyolf77_WMF @Urbanecm_WMF @Ankan_WMF @PPham -- I've gotten some additional feedback that we should shorten the edit summary and remove the counts for rejected and skipped. It would be like: "4 links added via link suggestions feature". What do you think? Or is it important to have the rejected and skipped counts?

Also, @Tgr -- if we were to remove the rejected and skipped counts from the edit summary, we would still have them in Special:Log, right? For analysis purposes?

@Trizek-WMF @Dyolf77_WMF @Urbanecm_WMF @Ankan_WMF @PPham -- I've gotten some additional feedback that we should shorten the edit summary and remove the counts for rejected and skipped. It would be like: "4 links added via link suggestions feature". What do you think? Or is it important to have the rejected and skipped counts?

The summary you suggested looks good to me -- thanks.

Also, @Tgr -- if we were to remove the rejected and skipped counts from the edit summary, we would still have them in Special:Log, right? For analysis purposes?

Shortening makes sense. It is better to try out than to guess: we will see if we have feedback from communities with this new wording.

@Trizek-WMF @Dyolf77_WMF @Urbanecm_WMF @Ankan_WMF @PPham -- I've gotten some additional feedback that we should shorten the edit summary and remove the counts for rejected and skipped. It would be like: "4 links added via link suggestions feature". What do you think? Or is it important to have the rejected and skipped counts?

It's Ok for me to shorten the summary.

@Trizek-WMF @Dyolf77_WMF @Urbanecm_WMF @Ankan_WMF @PPham -- I've gotten some additional feedback that we should shorten the edit summary and remove the counts for rejected and skipped. It would be like: "4 links added via link suggestions feature". What do you think? Or is it important to have the rejected and skipped counts?

It's okay to remove the counts for rejected and skipped. In the current format, the rejected (or skipped) edits are not checked, so I think it doesn't matter if it is not written in the summary.

Also, @Tgr -- if we were to remove the rejected and skipped counts from the edit summary, we would still have them in Special:Log, right? For analysis purposes?

Yeah, those are unrelated.

MMiller_WMF added a subscriber: mewoph.

@mewoph -- this is ready for development. Thank you!

Hi @MMiller_WMF

A new label, saying the edit is done through a feature (with no link, to avoid link fatigue)

I'm not sure what this is, can you clarify?

IIRC our discussions:

The edit summary is Link suggestions feature: $ links added. with no links.
The tag is the one already used: Suggested: add links. But this tag now needs to link to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyPage/Growth/Personalized_first_day/Structured_tasks/Add_a_link

Hope this helps!

Change 701167 had a related patch set uploaded (by MewOphaswongse; author: MewOphaswongse):

[mediawiki/extensions/GrowthExperiments@master] Add a link: change the edit summary

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/701167

Change 701167 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/GrowthExperiments@master] Add a link: change the edit summary

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/701167

Etonkovidova subscribed.

In cswiki wmf.12 (and I also checked arwiki) the Edit summary is displayed incorrectly:

Screen Shot 2021-07-02 at 7.35.52 AM.png (1×2 px, 315 KB)

Screen Shot 2021-07-02 at 7.40.10 AM.png (330×2 px, 154 KB)

Screen Shot 2021-07-02 at 7.27.36 AM.png (1×2 px, 377 KB)

betalabs doesn't show the issue - moving the task back to In Progress.

Screen Shot 2021-07-02 at 7.49.30 AM.png (1×2 px, 411 KB)

We should keep passing the parameters since translations won't be updated all at once.

Change 702995 had a related patch set uploaded (by MewOphaswongse; author: MewOphaswongse):

[mediawiki/extensions/GrowthExperiments@master] Add a link: Pass additional parameters to growthexperiments-addlink-summary-summary

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/702995

Since there are no more deploy windows until July 12, I'll add local overrides for the translations on the affected wikis (ar, bn, cs, vi). Those overrides can be deleted once the translations have been updated in Translatewiki (already the case for ar and cs) and deployed to production.

We should keep passing the parameters since translations won't be updated all at once.

I did realize that it’s about translation. But why it shows: Link suggestions: 3 accepted, $ 2 rejected, $ 3 skipped instead of Link suggestions: 3 accepted? I thought that $ 2 rejected, $ 3 skipped would be just removed.

@Etonkovidova Unfortunately the previous value for the key is static Návrhy odkazů: $1 přijato, $2 odmítnuto, $3 přeskočeno. so the $2 and $3 parameters are still needed.

Change 702995 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/GrowthExperiments@master] Add a link: Pass additional parameters to growthexperiments-addlink-summary-summary

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/702995

We should keep passing the parameters since translations won't be updated all at once.

I did realize that it’s about translation. But why it shows: Link suggestions: 3 accepted, $ 2 rejected, $ 3 skipped instead of Link suggestions: 3 accepted? I thought that $ 2 rejected, $ 3 skipped would be just removed.

Yes, me too. I thought that the conclusion of the discussions were in favor of keeping the number of added links only. I created this task after the discussion where we reached consensus about the content of the edit summary.

Also, I paste T286215: Encourage the use of PLURAL in MediaWiki:Logentry-growthexperiments-addlink here as a related task to work on.

Checked in testwiki wmf.14

  • Link suggestions feature: 0 links added - if all links were rejected
  • Link suggestions feature: 1 link added - if some links were accepted and some were rejected/skipped; in this example 1 link was accepted.
  • no record for the case when all links were skipped