feature request: additional informations showing full syntax should be included in pages as "No target"
Closed, DeclinedPublic


Author: gangleri

[[en:Special:Contributions]] called without the target parameter just
shows "No target".

It would be a(nother) just "nice to have" feature if the special pages
would provide the valid syntax for this page.

It maight be a good idea to include a "tag" (?) / "selector"
called "Syntax" at the top of EVERY page, not only for special pages but
also for the pages in the other namespaces.

Wikipedia is an "open" world. This is valid both for the articles, the
documentation, the "knowledge" and the "good to know's". (Peronlay) I
think putting a "Syntax" "tag" (?) / "selector" at the top of the pages
would be the most appropriate place, usefull, easy to find, easy to update
(from documentation point of view) and so on.

If a project specific text field containing links relevant to that project
(in that language), [[meta:]] and so on should be included is another
issue to discuss. What do you think about this?

Regards Reinhardt

Bugs related (somehow) to this: bug 884 (about providing more information
at the "Bad title" page)

Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
OS: Windows XP
Platform: PC
URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions


bzimport set Reference to bz891.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).
bzimport created this task.Nov 16 2004, 5:32 AM

gangleri wrote:

See also (about documentation) [[en:User talk:IMSoP#appendix_4]] == [[User
talk:IMSoP#appendix_4]] == [[User_talk:IMSoP#appendix_4]] <> [[User talk:IMSoP#appendix
4]] (the last one misses the anchor).

Regards Reinhardt

rowan.collins wrote:

I can see where you're coming from with this, but generally speaking the
software should make it unnecessary to construct these URLs anyway - the
software should generate them when you click the appropriate part of the syntax.
Of course, anyone writing a bot, or doing something particularly complex with
templates, would benefit from knowing how to generalise, but usually clicking
through a couple of examples should be enough to find out.

As for the specific example of the error produced by a special page that needs a
particular parameter, perhaps the best thing would be a message like "This page
shows the contributions of a particular user, but no user was specified." and
provide a box where the name of the user can be typed in. In fact, it could just
say "Type in the name of the user for whom you wish to see contributions: " and
forget that, as far as the software is concerned, this is an error. As I say,
the user should generally not be required to know the internal URL "syntax",
they should just be given an interface that constructs it for them.

brion added a comment.Nov 16 2004, 9:10 PM

Agreed with Rowan's comments; please file separate bugs for each
special page which doesn't provide a useful prompt when visited
directly but should.

Add Comment