As a WDQS maintainer, I want to be able to evaluate graph backend candidates for migrating WDQS off of Blazegraph, so that I can create a ranking/survey of alternatives, and ultimately choose the optimal one.
Prior candidate list and survey from when Blazegraph was chosen: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MXikljoSUVP77w7JKf9EXN40OB-ZkMqT8Y5b2NYVKbU/edit?usp=sharing
We will likely not use the same list as before, and will need to create a new list of criteria (and weighting of those criteria). The final list will aim to combine technical scaling considerations, as well as a relatively small finite list of community-sourced criteria (in the case that they do not totally overlap). While there will eventually be a better process for consolidating a final list of community-sourced criteria, (comments in) this ticket can be used to start collecting ideas for criteria.
- a list of criteria to evaluate graph backends for the purpose of scaling WDQS