Hello! Could someone please add peerj.com to Commons' wgCopyUploadsDomains whitelist?
PeerJ is an open-access scientific journal. All articles are licensed under CC BY (3.0 or 4.0).
Thank you!
Description
Description
Details
Details
| Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| commonswiki: Add peerj.com to wgCopyUploadsDomains whitelist | operations/mediawiki-config | master | +1 -0 |
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| · · · | ||||
| Resolved | None | T60224 Add domains to $wgCopyUploadsDomains (tracking) | ||
| Declined | • 4nn1l2 | T299247 Add peerj.com to Commons wgCopyUploadsDomains whitelist | ||
| · · · |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
No problem, @4nn1l2. Today, I uploaded c:File:Peerj-12593.pdf from https://peerj.com/articles/12593.pdf.
Comment Actions
Change 754612 had a related patch set uploaded (by 4nn1l2; author: 4nn1l2):
[operations/mediawiki-config@master] commonswiki: Add peerj.com to wgCopyUploadsDomains whitelist
Comment Actions
Change 754612 merged by jenkins-bot:
[operations/mediawiki-config@master] commonswiki: Add peerj.com to wgCopyUploadsDomains whitelist
Comment Actions
Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2022-01-18T12:29:30Z] <lucaswerkmeister-wmde@deploy1002> Synchronized wmf-config/InitialiseSettings.php: Config: [[gerrit:754612|commonswiki: Add peerj.com to wgCopyUploadsDomains whitelist (T299247)]] (duration: 00m 51s)
Comment Actions
@4nn1l2 reported the following error while trying this out:
There was a problem during the HTTP request: 432
It looks like PeerJ respond to HTTP requests without certain headers with the custom HTTP status “432” – someone on StackOverflow had the same issue. I think we’ll have to revert this; if anybody has contacts at PeerJ, feel free to tell them to fix their server, I’m pretty sure we won’t introduce custom code just for them on our end.
Comment Actions
That's disappointing. I tried to email their support address, but the email bounced (apparently it's a Google Group that doesn't accept emails). I suppose this will have to be reverted.