FlaggedRevs statistics are at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ValidationStatistics

For other special pages it is T6394

Using an info chip for this piece of information makes no sense – neither semantically (an info chip is a keyword, not part of a sentence) nor aesthetically. I can’t even triple-click-select the sentence because the info chip doesn’t support being triple-click-selected along with the context (since there should be no context). A simple <strong> instead of the info chip would have sufficed – or following the Codex table specifications more precisely, and hiding the number of pending changes in the pagination: Showing rows 1–50 of 1234 tells that there are currently 1234 pending changes.

In T304159#10075236, @Tacsipacsi wrote:

Using an info chip for this piece of information makes no sense – neither semantically (an info chip is a keyword, not part of a sentence) nor aesthetically. I can’t even triple-click-select the sentence because the info chip doesn’t support being triple-click-selected along with the context (since there should be no context). A simple <strong> instead of the info chip would have sufficed – or following the Codex table specifications more precisely, and hiding the number of pending changes in the pagination: Showing rows 1–50 of 1234 tells that there are currently 1234 pending changes.

@Tacsipacsi, the TablePager class has not been updated with Codex table pagination yet, so I've found a solution using a chip. I will update the TablePager class as soon as possible.

I don’t know the code, but I’m pretty sure you don’t need TablePager to be updated in order to use a simple <strong>: wherever you’re able to use complex HTML, you should also be able to use simple HTML. Following the Codex table specifications would be ideal, not using a wrong component (info chip) should be the minimum.