As discussed with Denny, Cory, and Ori, it would be good to try to write down the evaluation and validation rules of the Wikifunctions model. This would clarify the intended meaning of the language and provide us with a reference to which we can compare our implementation for correctness. It would also uncover potential problems in the model, and help us determine whether the model fits the requirements of WF and Abstract Wikipedia.
Description
Description
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
In Progress | DVrandecic | T282062 ZObject model: Add a key to Z3 to mark a key as optional | |||
Open | None | T290996 Support Optional Keys in Orchestrator | |||
Open | None | T314364 Use `data/definitions` Version of `Z983` in `function-orchestrator` Once We Have Unions | |||
Open | None | T292892 Function model: Introduce a Union generic type | |||
In Progress | DVrandecic | T296326 Discuss How to Implement Unions | |||
Resolved | • AAssaf | T307699 Formalize the semantics of the function model |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Very early draft with more details on the goals and assumptions: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1olASGiCWKbT-XjAHO528HgZsx_pmVHO5tbPlZFGiex4/edit?pli=1#