I also want to add that these screenshots are completely unedited so that you can see exactly what I am seeing on my side of the screen.

Also notice how the views on "Chaebol" and "Majida El Roumi" decrease in the first two screenshots, and then everything goes to 0 for some reason, even though that screenshot was taken after the first two.

Thank you @InfiniteSword for reporting!

I re-checked the pageview statistics logic ( "Views since you edited (last 60 days)" to verify the issues that you reported - please review the following and let me know if I miss anything.

(1) "Views since you edited (last 60 days)" means that the count of page views starts from a user's last edit on an article.
For example,

• A user makes several edits, all within the 60-day interval of the current date,

e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaebol&action=history . User:InfinitySword edited the article on 07/11/2022, 07/14/2022 and 07/16/2022.

• the stats on the Impact module would refer to 07/16/2022-current date

If the Impact module was viewed, for example on 07/13/2022 (after the edit was done on 07/11/2022) the stats for Chaebol article would show: 3,989 pageviews.
But viewing the Impact module, for example, on 07/15/2022 (shortly after the second edit was done on 07/14/2022) would display the pageview count or Chaebol article as 2,531, since the count of pageviews resets with each new edit.

(2) The question on the stats for Tortoiseshell cat - yes, the article has the higher count of pageviews than other articles displayed in the Impact module. However, the Impact module displays the articles where the most recent edits were done, not the articles with the highest pageview count.

(3) The case when the Impact module displays all zeros - most likely it was an outage in the pageview stats service. Did you try to click on the zero numbers? If you see the Impact module with zeros, it'd be great if you notice the time and after clicking on the zero, please copy the url.

The list shows the page views since your last edit, for the last five articles you have edited. Looking at your edit history, the list of articles is accurate; and since the pageviews are only counted after your last edit (not your last edit to that article, your last edit in general), the numbers do go down sometimes. I agree this is not great UX.

In T313176#8107012, @Tgr wrote:

The list shows the page views since your last edit, for the last five articles you have edited. Looking at your edit history, the list of articles is accurate; and since the pageviews are only counted after your last edit (not your last edit to that article, your last edit in general), the numbers do go down sometimes. I agree this is not great UX.

cc @KStoller-WMF @BKots-WMF @KieranMcCann to think about from product & design perspective.

I agree this in imperfect UX, but at least we are providing that "Views since you edited" disclaimer in the UI.

As we work on Impact Module improvements we should consider improvements here, but if this is a major technical lift (or might create performance issues if changed) then we should set it aside for Positive Reinforcement V2.

In T313176#8107012, @Tgr wrote:

The list shows the page views since your last edit, for the last five articles you have edited. Looking at your edit history, the list of articles is accurate; and since the pageviews are only counted after your last edit (not your last edit to that article, your last edit in general), the numbers do go down sometimes. I agree this is not great UX.

I am going to remove the Growth-Design tag as it seems like the fix for this task is the calculation to be as expected in the original proposed design – to make the pageviews are counted per article after the person's last edit to that particular article, *not* for last edit edit in general. @KStoller-WMF - can we discuss adding to the second or third iteration for impact module release?

to make the pageviews are counted per article after the person's last edit to that particular article, *not* for last edit edit in general.

That is done already in the new impact module. If it is not behaving that way, then we should fix it.

In T313176#8418573, @kostajh wrote:

to make the pageviews are counted per article after the person's last edit to that particular article, *not* for last edit edit in general.

That is done already in the new impact module. If it is not behaving that way, then we should fix it.

Oh that's great to hear! Should I put this in QA then for testing with the new impact module?

In T313176#8418662, @RHo wrote:

In T313176#8418573, @kostajh wrote:

to make the pageviews are counted per article after the person's last edit to that particular article, *not* for last edit edit in general.

That is done already in the new impact module. If it is not behaving that way, then we should fix it.

Oh that's great to hear! Should I put this in QA then for testing with the new impact module?

I put it in QA, but maybe this could be closed as a duplicate of T323253: NewImpact module: Page view data should be limited to when user made their first edit.