@mfossati I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say that T314863 led to article-level relevance scores. Also not sure what keeping null page QIDs means. Maybe we need to discuss when you're back from vacation at the next Section Topics meeting on Sept 19?

In T316925#8208410, @CBogen wrote:

@mfossati I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say that T314863 led to article-level relevance scores.

Given a topic, relevance can be measured with respect to the article or to the section.
With the SEO use case in mind, the first implementation is at the article level. This would enable a ranking of topics per article.
The section-level score can be computed separately.

Also not sure what keeping null page QIDs means.

Page titles or topic titles don't necessarily have a QID on Wikidata, resulting in null values in the dataset. The score is based on QIDs, so we can't compute it if they're null.

Maybe we need to discuss when you're back from vacation at the next Section Topics meeting on Sept 19?

Yes, I'll add that on the agenda document.

In T316925#8208516, @mfossati wrote:

In T316925#8208410, @CBogen wrote:

@mfossati I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say that T314863 led to article-level relevance scores.

Given a topic, relevance can be measured with respect to the article or to the section.
With the SEO use case in mind, the first implementation is at the article level. This would enable a ranking of topics per article.
The section-level score can be computed separately.

IMO T314863 should not be considered complete until it also has a section-level relevance score. That was my understanding of the purpose of that ticket, since that is what is needed for our main use case (section-level image suggestions) and what will also be needed for the schema.org use case (since the goal is to display information about each section in Google).

Also not sure what keeping null page QIDs means.

Page titles or topic titles don't necessarily have a QID on Wikidata, resulting in null values in the dataset. The score is based on QIDs, so we can't compute it if they're null.

Sounds like there's no reason to keep those, but let's discuss further when we meet.

Moving back to the backlog until T314863 is complete and we can estimate

Moving to blocked: discarding the TF-IDF component columns will be done after T318348: [SPIKE] Section-level topic relevance score.