+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #28081 +++
On Bug 27695 comment 0, Bawolff suggested the possibility of migrating from ReaderFeedback to ArticleFeedback on wikis which already have the extension installed.
Some time before that, users from Portuguese Wikipedia have reached consensus about installing it on ptwiki as soon as it is available (see bug 28081) and users from other wikis have also asked about the possibility of use of AFT on their wikis (see e.g. [[mw:Thread:Talk:Article_feedback/Eswiki_article_feedback]]).
A similar pool was also made on ptwikibooks and the users are favorable to switching from ReaderFeedback to ArticleFeedback extension.
I don't know if the two extensions are similar enough to make it possible some kind of reuse of the data already collected by ReaderFeedback. If this is not the case, it would be good if the current data were exported to some table having at least the page names and average rating of the page. Would it be possible to do that?
Per discussion on above URL, could someone setup the ArticleFeedback extension on Portuguese Wikibooks with the following configuration?
$wgArticleFeedbackCategories = array();
$wgArticleFeedbackNamespaces = array( NS_MAIN, NS_HELP, NS_PROJECT );
$wgArticleFeedbackLotteryOdds = 100;
$wgArticleFeedbackDashboard = true;