Good point.
@Sarai-WMDE Do you have an idea for better copy?

'Refine item selection' is definitely a very accurate label for the button in case you accessed the results page from the tool's main page. I agree, though, that this might sound confusing for gadget users, who follow a different path there. Some alternatives that might work (please let us know what you think, @Nikki 🙏 ):

1. 'Modify item selection'
2. 'Find new mismatches'
3. 'Back to item selection'

(Please note that 'item' was lowercased deliberately. Let me know there're any reasons not to do so).

In T323682#8417019, @Sarai-WMDE wrote:

'Refine item selection' is definitely a very accurate label for the button in case you accessed the results page from the tool's main page. I agree, though, that this might sound confusing for gadget users, who follow a different path there. Some alternatives that might work (please let us know what you think, @Nikki 🙏 ):

1. 'Modify item selection'
2. 'Find new mismatches'
3. 'Back to item selection'

Arian and I discussed it and option 2 seems best, we just updated "new" to "more" because "new" might imply that you can get new mismatches for the same Item on top of the ones you already see.

(Please note that 'item' was lowercased deliberately. Let me know there're any reasons not to do so).

Yes we keep these capitalized intentionally when talking about the Wikidata concepts to keep them apart from the general concept of an item or property for example.

Sounds good! I agree with your replacement of 'new' by 'more': good idea. Thanks for updating the task description 🙏🏻

Copy change: https://github.com/wmde/wikidata-mismatch-finder/pull/482

Merged. Thanks @guergana.tzatchkova !

Can be verified on https://mismatch-finder.toolforge.org/results?ids=Q31