Thanks Hailey, I agree it would be good to add a distinction here so it's clear that these settings don't impact the mobile app's image recommendations.
We are working to finalize language for the new Community Configuration form, so I'll chat with @JFernandez-WMF about this task.

Thanks @HNordeenWMF, I added this disclaimer in our designs:

cc @KStoller-WMF

Note from discussion: due to the generic configuration form, it's challenging to add this text to the sub-sections of the form, but we can easily add it to the top of the form fairly easily.

@JFernandez-WMF - can you mockup a design for including this to the top of the Suggested Edits form?

Could this be implemented in CommunityConfiguration with the functionality described in T358221: Add support for displaying grouped configurations / T358335: Allow to display informational header text in the editor or is there something else missing?

If we accept to have the section only displayed once at the top of the suggested edits form this task is already actionable. If we really wanted to have the informational section displayed two times in the context of each task type we'd need ad-hoc development. Not sure if T358221 grouping would help for this. The reason why T358221 is related to this is because both tasks would benefit from implementing a UI declaration abstraction, aka UI schema mentioned in T343072: Community configuration: Write specifications for the Editing form

I'll discuss with Julieta, I think we should keep this simple and add the info to the top of the form.
However, we should also then add some general information about Suggested Edits.

I have updated the task description with the mockup that displays the disclaimer at the top of the form. Thanks all!

Change #1031398 had a related patch set uploaded (by Cyndywikime; author: Cyndywikime):

[mediawiki/extensions/GrowthExperiments@master] Add documentation for communityconfiguration-growthsuggestededits-info-text

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1031398

@JFernandez-WMF - the figma design(Labelled as New Design) in the task contains another paragraph starting with Some type of Newcomer Tasks are surfaced..... Is this paragraph also supposed to be part of the Acceptance Criteria? CC: @KStoller-WMF

In T359080#9794243, @Cyndymediawiksim wrote:

@JFernandez-WMF - the figma design(Labelled as New Design) in the task contains another paragraph starting with Some type of Newcomer Tasks are surfaced..... Is this paragraph also supposed to be part of the Acceptance Criteria? CC: @KStoller-WMF

That text is contextual to the first field not the whole form so we cannot display now as it shows in the designs. Also we don't have support for html parsing (hence the links) in help texts yet. I would omit it for now.

In T359080#9794246, @Sgs wrote:

In T359080#9794243, @Cyndymediawiksim wrote:

@JFernandez-WMF - the figma design(Labelled as New Design) in the task contains another paragraph starting with Some type of Newcomer Tasks are surfaced..... Is this paragraph also supposed to be part of the Acceptance Criteria? CC: @KStoller-WMF

That text is contextual to the first field not the whole form so we cannot display now as it shows in the designs. Also we don't have support for html parsing (hence the links) in help texts yet. I would omit it for now.

Thanks @Sgs !

@Etonkovidova , to note while testing this, there are 2 new line breaks between the two paragraphs in the informational section of the Suggested edits because MediaWiki ignores single line breaks by treating them as a single space. The design in the figma could not be achieved.
@JFernandez-WMF, is this acceptable?

Change #1031398 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/GrowthExperiments@master] Add communityconfiguration-growthsuggestededits-info-text key

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1031398