Page MenuHomePhabricator

Linter seemingly ignored no-included content.
Closed, DuplicatePublicBUG REPORT

Description

Steps to replicate the issue (include links if applicable):

What happens?:
Reports - Template:EB9_Index_Page https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Template:EB9_Index_Page&action=edit&lintid=3237868 as having a missing end tag.

What should have happened instead?:
listed item should not have been reported, as examination of the page showed the 'missing tag' was present, but noinlcuded, (this is consistent with the tag being used as header template on other pages.)

Either : The noincluded content should have been included in the linter analysis, or the UI should have provided additional context explaining exactly what had been considered.

It's tiresome to have to scan through 'not-broken' items, to find ones that need genuine repairs.

Event Timeline

This is a known bug, one of many in Linter related to include/noinclude tags; this one popped up sometime around a year ago. I poked around to look for a phabricator task, but I can't find it. The workaround is to put a line break before the noinclude tag. We had to do this to a pile of templates on en.WP.

If I do that I get a fostered content warning, but that's apparently due to a different bug

I poked around to look for a phabricator task, but I can't find it

T348296 ?

Do you have a regexp to find paged with affected constructions? ~~~~