Launched the study this afternoon. Shouldn't take more than 24 hours or so to get 10 participants.

Carried over from sprint 6.

Experiment is complete and analysis is written.

tl;dr

We might have a hit on our hands with this feature. Participants found it easy to use, useful, and had an appropriate level of trust in the machine-generated summary. Responses were much more positive than I expected. The main issue to be addressed before release is ambiguity between the Simple Summary and the main article content while the simple summary accordion is closed.

In T374638#10196787, @JScherer-WMF wrote:

Experiment is complete and analysis is written.

tl;dr

We might have a hit on our hands with this feature. Participants found it easy to use, useful, and had an appropriate level of trust in the machine-generated summary. Responses were much more positive than I expected. The main issue to be addressed before release is ambiguity between the Simple Summary and the main article content while the simple summary accordion is closed.

@JScherer-WMF - would it be okay to publish the protocol as well prior to resolving? I'll then move it to our main documentation on mw

Justin will provide update by end of day.

Protocol

1. You are looking at the top section of the Wikipedia article about Dopamine. Without clicking anything, find the section labelled "Simple Summary". Based on what you see, describe in your own words what you think the Simple Summary section does.
2. Without clicking anything, describe what information, if any, is missing from the Simple Summary section.
3. Without clicking anything, please describe what you think "Unverified" means.
4. What do you expect to happen if you click on the Simple Summary section?
5. Click on the Simple Summary section. Did it do what you expected? Why or why not?
6. Please describe in your own words what a Simple Summary is.
7. Please indicate which section or sections of the page were generated by AI. What makes you think an AI created those sections of the page?
8. What information, if any, is missing from this page?
9. If you wanted to find out more about the Simple Summary of this article what steps would you take?
10. Would you trust the information presented in the Simple Summary? Why or why not?
11. What aspect of the Simple Summary section confused you?
12. What ideas do you have about how Simple Summaries could be improved?
13. What do you think about seeing features like Simple Summaries on Wikipedia?

All done, thank you @JScherer-WMF!