This was caused by T378336

@Strainu have you seen someone who doesn't meet the requirements gaining the right?

Follows from T369187: Allow users to be autopromoted into checkuser-temporary-account-viewer group based on local criteria

The rules are:

// Allow users to be auto-promoted to the checkuser-temporary-account-viewer group based on criteria
	// listed at https://w.wiki/BESb#Patrollers_and_other_users (T369187).
	$wgAutopromoteOnce['onEdit']['checkuser-temporary-account-viewer'] = [ '&',
		[ APCOND_EDITCOUNT, 300 ],
		[ APCOND_AGE, 6 * 30 * 86400 ], // 6 * 30 * seconds in a day, which makes 6 months
		// Exclude auto-promoting when the user already has the right through another group that has access
		[ '!', [ APCOND_INGROUPS, 'sysop' ] ],
		[ '!', [ APCOND_INGROUPS, 'checkuser' ] ],
		[ '!', [ APCOND_INGROUPS, 'suppress' ] ],
		[ '!', [ APCOND_INGROUPS, 'bureaucrat' ] ],
		// Exclude bots from the autopromotion, as the group should be granted manually to these users.
		[ '!', [ APCOND_INGROUPS, 'bot' ] ],
	];

from rOMWC39d155498344: Autopromote users into checkuser-temporary-account-viewer.

Spot checking some of the entries on https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Jurnal/rights, the users I saw meet the criteria.

All the users meet these requirements. However:

• Shouldn't the users also accept the agreement?
• I understand these are the wmf requirements, butnthey are waaay to lax.

The issue was observed because a user who's autoconfirmed and extended confirmed rights have been withdrawn received this right, which is extemely confusing from a patroller's pov.

In T379077#10292791, @Strainu wrote:

All the users meet these requirements. However:

• Shouldn't the users also accept the agreement?

Users will have to accept the agreement before they can actually view IP information for a temporary account.

I understand you don't want to give and take the right when a preference is changed, but maybe then rename the right to "eligible for vieweing IPs"?

In T379077#10292829, @Strainu wrote:

I understand you don't want to give and take the right when a preference is changed, but maybe then rename the right to "eligible for vieweing IPs"?

@sgrabarczuk @Niharika what do you think?

In T379077#10308504, @kostajh wrote:

In T379077#10292829, @Strainu wrote:

I understand you don't want to give and take the right when a preference is changed, but maybe then rename the right to "eligible for vieweing IPs"?

@sgrabarczuk @Niharika what do you think?

This problem seems to be linked to the one @Urbanecm filed a solution for : T380468: Improve how we log who has access to IP reveal feature.
I'm a bit confused about the right though. Task T380468 talks about checkuser-temporary-account-viewer whereas this task mentioned the temporary account IP viewer right instead. Can someone help explain the discrepancy?