Page MenuHomePhabricator

Check guardrail metrics for initial deployment of Multi-Check Phase 1 (side rail + single Check)
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

In T378777, we will evolve the desktop Reference Check experience by presenting the Check in a side rail that will live adjacent to the editable content, rather than presenting the Check within the editable content.

This task involves the work of analyzing how –if at all – the change described above (and visualized below) impacts the Edit Check guardrail metrics we've established.

Change

Before T378777 | After T378777

Screenshot 2024-10-31 at 16.16.08.png (1×2 px, 973 KB)
Screenshot 2024-10-31 at 16.15.41.png (928×1 px, 270 KB)

Decision(s) to be made

  • What – if any – further investigations will we prioritize doing to understand what might be contributing to the changes in the "Metrics" detailed in the "Research questions" section below?

Research questions

  1. Do we notice a change in how likely the Reference Check is to be disrupting people as measured by:
    • Edit completion rate
    • False positive report rate
    • Revert rate
    • Proportion of new content edits that include a reference
  1. Do we notice a change in how likely the Reference Check is to cause people to publish constructive edits as measured by:
    • Absolute number of people who are adding a citation as a result of this rule change
    • Proportion of edits Edit Check was activated within that result in a new reference being added (and the edit not being reverted)
NOTE: to answer the questions above, we will use the parametized notebook @MNeisler created in T380540.

Event Timeline

MNeisler moved this task from Doing to Needs Review on the Product-Analytics (Kanban) board.

I've completed a pre and post-deployment analysis assessing the impact of moving the single reference check to the side rail (multi-check phase 1).

Overall, we did not observe any sharp declines or increases in the identified guardrail metrics following the deployment of the change.

We did observe some slight positive changes indicating that the new location of reference check to the side rail may be increasing user engagement with the check. These positive changes include an increase in the proportion of edits that were shown reference check and added a reference and a decrease in revert rate of new content edits. However, as this is not a controlled experiment, other potential external factors may contribute to some of these observed changes.

Please see the full report for a summary of high-level findings and additional breakdowns and details.

cc @ppelberg

Code repo

Resolving this task as we've: