Please provide all the following information:

• Context. Provide a short paragraph with some background context for your request, please include links to relevant material.

In 2024/25 , through the knowledge equity objective, we have had an opportunity to support 5 new languages Southern Ndebele (nrwiki), Iban (ibawiki), Obolo (annwiki), Tai Nüa (tddwiki), Pannonian Rusyn (rskwiki) . So far we have tested several hypothesis as defined in the 2024-24 Annual plan. Learnings from this experiment, highlighted that most of the test Wikipedias that were allowed to ‘graduate’ from the Incubator early and receive full production access were in fact experiencing decreased content editing activity. We however learnt that the decline in edits was not limited to these wikis, but to other wikis that have graduated recently for example Central Dusin Wikipedia created on 28th May 2024, Angika wikipedia created on 22nd March 2024 and Kusaal Wikipedia created on 24th April 2024 just to mention a few. In terms of article creation, we observed that only Iban Wikipedia showed a significant increase in the number of articles created, while others either remained stable or declined.

Digging up this further, we observed different patterns of content growth in various wikis. For example, looking at a few recently launched wikis from this list that have either grown fairly quickly or declined since their launch-Betawi Wikipedia, which has reached nearly 3,000 articles since its launch in April 2024-what’s their story? Or how did Moroccan Amazigh Wikipedia managed to create over 11,000 articles since its launch in November 2023 with 36 editors? On the other hand, what happened to Dinka Wikipedia, which, since its launch in 2017, has struggled to surpass 400 articles and grow beyond 11 editors?

• Description.*What is your request about?
  • Provide observations and inferences about reasonable content growth in x set of wikis within a certain period of time from graduation date
  • Provide observations and inferences about slow content growth in x set of wikis within a certain period of time from graduation date

Scope

• Wikipedias
• Specific set of languages (to be determined)
• The focus is on research to provide observations and inferences
• Both Qualitative and Quantitative insights
• To be added as relevant

Draft deliverables(s)

• A set of observations and inferences about reasonable content growth and slow growth in x set of wikis within a certain period of time from graduation date. How was content created in these wikis? (Mobile, desktop, visual editor, CX?) How has content grown over time? (Quantity & Quality aspects (edits, images, refs etc) ) what are the types of content? (topics?)(any other additional questions)
  • Priority Please indicate a priority of your task and a small description of what it would unlock for you. We ask you to leave this task as “needs triage” since your request will go through a Backlog refinement process where our team will prioritize the work.

High. This work is a continuation of our OKR work and will help us explore potential interventions to support content growth for languages with a smaller presence on our platform. We expect this work to contribute to vital knowledge objective. Ideally, it would be great if this work can be prioritized for Q1.

I need this task resolved in:

• 1 month.
• 3 months.
• 6 months.
• Whenever you get to it :-)

• Other. Do you have any other questions or comments ?

Ground work is needed to align on definitions for this research for example what is reasonable content growth? what does slow growth mean? What are the set of wikis to draw observations and inferences from?

For use by WMF Research team; please leave everything below as it is:

1. Does the request serve one of the existing Research team's audiences? If yes, choose the primary audience. (1 of 4) Yes. WMF
2. What is the type of work requested? insights and recommendations for decision making
3. What is the impact of responding to this request?
   • Support a technology or policy need of one or more WM projects
   • Advance the understanding of the WM projects.
   • Something else. If you choose this option, please explain briefly the impact below.