Page MenuHomePhabricator

RfC: Dismissable notices
Closed, DeclinedPublic


We need to decide on the Dismissable notices RfC.



Event Timeline

flimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Sep 12 2014, 1:47 AM
flimport added a project: Architecture.
flimport set Reference to fl578.
daniel changed the task status from Open to Stalled.Feb 27 2015, 11:43 PM
daniel moved this task from P1: Define to Old on the TechCom-RFC board.
daniel added a subscriber: daniel.

Seems dead. Is it obsolete?

It might be obsolete. I know the dismissable sitenotice extension is a lot better than it used to be, at least, and certainly at this point if someone wants to go making either extension better I doubt it needs an RfC.

Krinkle added a subscriber: Krinkle.

This seems out of scope for the RFC process as it describes problems that are:

  • already solved,
  • or; solvable with minor changes to the DismissableSiteNotice extension that do not affect the overall architecture of the extension (out of scope for TechCom to proactively lead decisions about).
  • or; solvable with changes to CentralNotice that don't affect its overall architecture per se. (If and when such proposal is accepted by the maintainers of CentralNotice and the preferred solution requires major changes that are cross-cutting and/or hard to undo, then an RFC could be created for that now, or later).