Summary
'Groups' was ranked the third most important piece of information in the feedback survey that we ran.
Acceptance criteria
- List of explicit groups (not implicit groups like *, user, temp) appear in the user info card
| KColeman-WMF | |
| Apr 14 2025, 1:15 PM |
| F62468839: image.png | |
| Jun 26 2025, 1:47 AM |
| F62378564: image.png | |
| Jun 18 2025, 4:00 PM |
'Groups' was ranked the third most important piece of information in the feedback survey that we ran.
| Subject | Author | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UserInfoCard: Display user groups | Kosta Harlan | mediawiki/extensions/CheckUser | master | +59 -12 |
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | KColeman-WMF | T384725 [Epic] WE4.2.18 UserInfoCard experiment for assisting patrollers and moderators | |||
| Resolved | KColeman-WMF | T384702 UserInfoCard: Design a clickable component to display account information | |||
| Resolved | kostajh | T391831 UserInfoCard: Display user groups |
@KColeman-WMF should this be "Groups:" for the label and a comma-separated list of groups?
Change #1160879 had a related patch set uploaded (by Kosta Harlan; author: Kosta Harlan):
[mediawiki/extensions/CheckUser@master] (WIP) UserInfoCard: Display groups
Should the group name be the name used in code, or the human-readable value? e.g. for event coordinator:
The translated version is generally ideal, but the machine name is going to be much shorter (albeit in English only)
Having written that out, I think we need to go with the translated labels associated with these groups.
Change #1160879 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/CheckUser@master] UserInfoCard: Display user groups
QA is completed: The new code has been implemented and is functioning as expected (Per the Acceptance Criteria).