Please provide a trustworthy reference.

abdulla.karimov wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uzbek_language
http://groups.google.com/group/floss-uz-l10n/msg/d56f7ac357b54947
http://www.worldcat.org/title/english-uzbek-uzbek-english-dictionary-70000-words-and-expressions-inglizcha-ozbekcha-ozbekcha-inglizcha-lugat-70000-soz-va-ibora/oclc/500879068
First case is slightly wrong, since we use okina instead of plain apostrophe (to keep words intact).

Thank you for your bug report and to have supplied the relevant references.

Taking this bug.

Code review: Gerrit change #10443

Sorry, the correct code review link is Gerrit review #10443.

Code review (the correct link this time): Gerrit change #10465

Given that CLDR has "Ўзбек" as autonym, I do wonder if it's a good idea to change. Can you provide a little background on what the difference is between "O'zbek" and "Oʻzbekcha", aside from the apostrophe?

abdulla.karimov wrote:

The "-cha" ("-çe", "-ça", "-sha") suffix is typical in Turkic languages, it forms a language name from nationality name (e.g. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-%C3%A7a ). There is also "Oʻzbek tili" expression (which was shortened to current interwiki title "Oʻzbek"), but it means "Language of Uzbek", and we need to change it to "Oʻzbekcha" ("Uzbek language").

Merged. Thanks for the explanations, and Dereckson thanks for the patch.