The ones described in this ticket should be available that way, yes.

In T393818#10948622, @DLynch wrote:

The ones described in this ticket should be available that way, yes.

Excellent, ok. Thank you for confirming, David.

Next steps

• Megan to finish populating requirements
• David to confirm instrumentation is implemented
• Esther to QA
• Megan to QA

Had to update the actions for the button-presses, but this should now be testable as-described.

✅ ===Requirements are being logged client-side

• editCheck-tone -> check-shown-[moment]:

{
    ...
    "is_bot": false,
    "feature": "editCheck-tone",
    "action": "check-shown-presave",
    "editor_interface": "visualeditor",
    ...
}

{
    ...
    "is_bot": false,
    "feature": "editCheck-tone",
    "action": "check-shown-midedit",
    "editor_interface": "visualeditor",
    ...
}

• editCheck-tone -> action-dismiss:

{
    ...
    "is_bot": false,
    "feature": "editCheck-tone",
    "action": "action-dismiss",
    "editor_interface": "visualeditor",
    ...
}

• editCheckDialog -> window-open-from-check-[moment]:

{
    ...
    "is_bot": false,
    "feature": "editCheckDialog",
    "action": "window-open-from-check-midedit",
    "editor_interface": "visualeditor",
    ...
}

• editCheck-tone -> action-edit:

@EAkinloose: can you please confirm what wiki you tested this on? This information will help Megan verify events are being emitted and logged as expected.

In T393818#10989827, @ppelberg wrote:

@EAkinloose: can you please confirm what wiki you tested this on? This information will help Megan verify events are being emitted and logged as expected.

en-beta. https://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Basic_example_test_sheet&veaction=edit&ecenable=2&trackdebug=1

In T393818#10989848, @EAkinloose wrote:

In T393818#10989827, @ppelberg wrote:

@EAkinloose: can you please confirm what wiki you tested this on? This information will help Megan verify events are being emitted and logged as expected.

en-beta. https://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Basic_example_test_sheet&veaction=edit&ecenable=2&trackdebug=1

Wonderful – thank you for confirming, Esther.

I ran a quick check to verify events to track tone check engagement are being stored as expected in VisualEditorFeatureUse. This is based on a review of test events that have been generated on various wikis since events were implemented through 10 July 2025.

See summary of the checks completed below:

• 13 test editing sessions logged on enwiki, frwiki, and ptwiki so far. 46 total distinct tone check events recorded.
• All expected tone check events are logged including: action-dismiss, action-edit, check-shown-midedit, check-shown-presave, click-learn-more.
• Events are correctly associated with the editCheck-tone feature.
• The most frequently logged event is check-shown-midedit. There have been 25 check-shown-midedit eents and only 1 check-shown-presave event so far based on test events.
• All events are recorded as occurring with visualeditor (editor_interface = 'visualeditor')
• Tone check events are logged for both platform and mobile platforms
• Tone Check events are logged for both unregistred and registered users.
• The order of events within a session appears as expected (i.e. check-shown-midedit appears before action-edit)

I've updated the VEFU data dictionary so these new tone check events are now reflected there.

Note: QA to confirm bucketing is balanced and bucketing specific fields are logging as expected will occur in T395090