Page MenuHomePhabricator

Introduce a new split for developed sister projects (Commons and Wikidata)
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

Since April 2025 we're seeing some growth in new active editors which is largely contributed by Commons and Wikidata. In the Active editors query we are restricting Developed wikis to the 8 wikis as defined here and Emerging = everything else, meaning the remaining 320+ wikipedias, Commons, Wikidata, wikisource, wikibooks etc.

We have heard concerns from consumers of health metrics that Commons & Wikidata are not Wikipedias and are not language-or-region-specific – and hence we shouldn't be comparing their content & editor growth to Wikipedia. And that it's misleading to label them as emerging.

A solution to this problem that the Movement Insights team agreed to would be to introduce a 3rd category of projects. ie
Developed WPs, Developed Sister Projects, Emerging Wikis

Event Timeline

I just want to resurface my suggestion for naming the groups differently:

  • Top 8 Wikipedias
  • Commons and Wikidata
  • Other wikis

The huge advantage of this is that there's no need for definitions unless someone wants to know exactly which 8 Wikipedias are top. With the proposed name, every category needs a definition for basic understanding (does developed WPs mean the top 100 or the top 5? which sister projects are developed? is emerging wikis everything not covered by the first two groups, or are some wikis left out?).

nshahquinn-wmf renamed this task from Introduce a new split for Developed sister projects - Commons and Wikidata to Introduce a new split for developed sister projects (Commons and Wikidata).Sep 12 2025, 5:42 PM

In the team meeting we decided to go with:

Developed Wikipedias
Wikidata and Commons
Emerging Wikis