Page MenuHomePhabricator
Create Task
Maniphest T408923

Secondary sort key (timestamp) should be in descending order on Collaborative contributions table
Closed, DeclinedPublic
Actions

Description

Followup from T400722

Timestamp is correctly used as a secondary sort key, but it is currently used as a secondary sort key in ascending order, whereas when timestamp is used as the default (primary) sort key, it is used in descending order.

Acceptance criteria:
The secondary timestamp sort key should also be descending, as it is when the default view for the contributions tab is viewed.

Related Objects
Search...

Event Timeline

vaughnwalters created this task.Oct 31 2025, 3:08 PM
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptOct 31 2025, 3:08 PM
vaughnwalters renamed this task from Second sort key (timestamp) should be in descending order on Collaborative contributions table to Secondary sort key (timestamp) should be in descending order on Collaborative contributions table.Oct 31 2025, 3:08 PM
vaughnwalters added a parent task: T408256: [Epic] Collaborative contributions fix it tasks.
vaughnwalters updated the task description. (Show Details)
Daimona subscribed.Oct 31 2025, 3:42 PM

I mentioned this in T400722#11126865 and following comments, it's not really possible to change this given what's currently supported by the IndexPager hierarchy. All the sort keys will need to use the same direction.

vaughnwalters mentioned this in T400722: Add "Contributions" tab to EventDetails special page (table view).Oct 31 2025, 8:26 PM
vaughnwalters added a comment.Nov 3 2025, 5:25 PM
In T408923#11331590, @Daimona wrote:

I mentioned this in T400722#11126865 and following comments, it's not really possible to change this given what's currently supported by the IndexPager hierarchy. All the sort keys will need to use the same direction.

Okay, does this need to be marked as invalid or declined then?

Daimona added a comment.Nov 3 2025, 5:31 PM
In T408923#11336804, @vaughnwalters wrote:
In T408923#11331590, @Daimona wrote:

I mentioned this in T400722#11126865 and following comments, it's not really possible to change this given what's currently supported by the IndexPager hierarchy. All the sort keys will need to use the same direction.

Okay, does this need to be marked as invalid or declined then?

Yeah, I think so, based on previous conversation in T400722. It could be reopened if there are many requests for it, but it wouldn't be a trivial change.

Daimona closed this task as Declined.Nov 3 2025, 5:31 PM
VPuffetMichel added a project: OKR-Work.Dec 9 2025, 12:13 AM
Content licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 unless otherwise noted; code licensed under GNU General Public License (GPL) 2.0 or later and other open source licenses. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Code of Conduct. · Wikimedia Foundation · Privacy Policy · Code of Conduct · Terms of Use · Disclaimer · CC-BY-SA · GPL · Credits