See [[Email_address#Examples]]:
Abc.@example.com
Abc..123@example.com
Version: 1.21.x
Severity: minor
See Also:
T41236: Some valid Email addresses cannot be accepted
Description
Description
Details
Details
- Reference
- bz39239
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T21719 HTML5 features (tracking) | |||
| Open | None | T41239 Some invalid Email addresses are accepted (Abc.@example.com Abc..123@example.com) |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
I thought there was a giant thread somewhere (on the old CR maybe) where it was decided we would use a less strict validation to preserve sanity (or at least use html5's definition of an email instead of the rfc's definition of an email).