| Christian1985 | |
| Jan 8 2026, 7:29 PM |
| F71691850: Screenshot 2026-02-05 at 16.21.28.png | |
| Feb 5 2026, 3:25 PM |
| F71529900: image.png | |
| Jan 15 2026, 8:32 AM |
| F71527622: Screenshot 2026-01-14 at 23.57.08.png | |
| Jan 14 2026, 10:58 PM |
| F71470456: image.png | |
| Jan 8 2026, 7:29 PM |
| F71470442: image.png | |
| Jan 8 2026, 7:29 PM |
Im using Ubuntu 24.04 with Chrome 143.0.7499.192 (Offizieller Build) (64-Bit).
The math code
<math> \int_{50}^{150} \frac{1}{\log(t)} \mathrm{d}t = 22{,}033\ldots,</math>
while using mathjax rendering will be displayed as
The limits must be to the right of the integral.
The example is taken from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemannsche_Vermutung
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | BUG REPORT | Physikerwelt | T414122 Integrals with MathJax rendering displayed wrong | ||
| Resolved | Physikerwelt | T416605 Wrong MathJax integrals with one limit |
Hello @Physikerwelt ,
thanks for your answer. You are right for integrals with two limits the bug is fixed, but for integrals with only lower limits the bug still exists:
This example is takem from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signatursatz_von_Hirzebruch Shall I open a new bug ticket? Or would you reuse this one?
In the article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satz_von_Stokes you can find integrals with one and with two limits und line integrals. They do not fit to each other.
Hello @Physikerwelt ,
thanks for your answer. You are right for integrals with two limits the bug is fixed, but for integrals with only lower limits the bug still exists:
This example is takem from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signatursatz_von_Hirzebruch Shall I open a new bug ticket? Or would you reuse this one?
In the article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satz_von_Stokes you can find integrals with one and with two limits und line integrals. They do not fit to each other.
@Christian1985 the change I wrote yesterday should fix that, so no extra ticket needed.
@Christian1985 it seems this is still wrong
I must have missed that when comparing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Displaying_a_formula to https://en.wikipedia.beta.wmcloud.org/wiki/Extension:Math/Help:Formula
by now they should be identically, and I was under the impression that I did check that before.
