Page MenuHomePhabricator

Article Guidance entry point exploration
Closed, ResolvedPublic8 Estimated Story Points

Assigned To
Authored By
Pginer-WMF
Jan 13 2026, 9:28 PM
Referenced Files
F72275354: Outlines.png
Feb 23 2026, 9:48 AM
F72275352: Direct.png
Feb 23 2026, 9:48 AM
F72275350: Homepage.png
Feb 23 2026, 9:48 AM
F72275348: Red links.png
Feb 23 2026, 9:48 AM
F72170837: Outlines.png
Feb 18 2026, 1:25 PM
F72170835: Direct.png
Feb 18 2026, 1:25 PM
F72153696: Outlines.png
Feb 17 2026, 5:02 PM
F72153667: Direct.png
Feb 17 2026, 5:02 PM

Description

As part of Article Guidance (T396029) first intervention, we plan to help junior editors when they try to create an article. Given that the intended impact is about reducing deletion rate (T414503), the specific entry points were not defined as part of the main workflow (T414409).

This ticket is intended to explore the specific entry points that can be useful for the experiment.

Considerations:

  • Entry points proposed should work in an A/B testing context. That is, considering that half of the users using the entry point will be directed to the new feature, while the other half will be sent directly to Visual Editor (without additional guidance), the entry point should not anticipate the destination in any way. For example, we cannot show an invite to "try the new guided experience", since half of the users will get the old experience instead.
  • We should be careful increasing the volume of contributions. Enabling very prominent entry points can bring an influx of new articles: half of it with the old experience (which we know it often leads to deletion), and half to the new experience (before we have validated to which extent the proposal helps reduce low quality contributions). As a consequence, even if the proposal achieves a lower deletion rate, due to an increase of contribution volume and the effects of a/b testing, the overall number of low quality articles may actually increase.
  • Only a small set of article types will be supported. As part of the initial intervention, guidance will be provided only for a limited set of article types. We may need to consider how the entry point works under that limitation.

Proposed entry points

After the previous investigation in T414535#11620008, the design exploration and iterating it based on feedback, I'm sharing an initial proposal for entry points for Article Guidance.

The proposal covers two sets of entry points:

  • For the experiment. Two entry points supporting different situations:
    1. Red links with criteria (T420385). Red links represent missing pages identified by the community. A criteria based on the specific page or category will determine which redlinks are part of the experiment.
    2. Turkish Wikipedia homepage (T421224). Turkish Wikipedia has an existing visible entry point for article creation on their home page, that connects with Article Wizard.
  • For the community to try and adjust the guidance (results excluded from the experiment). To allow communities (in pilot wikis and beyond) to try the feature, provide guidance for new types of articles and quickly check how it works, we propose two entry points:
    1. Direct access to special page. Direct access to the Article Guidance feature to try it.
    2. Outline pages (T420457). Communities define guidance for a specific article type in an outline page. Providing an option to try the creation of contents using the guideline will facilitate the cycle of adjusting and trying the feature for communities.

Each entry point is detailed in the corresponding sections below (and designs in Figma). For each of them there is a common set of measurements that will help understand how are they working.

Aspects to observe:

  • Percentage of article creation left out of the experiment.
  • Percentage of topics in the new guided experience for which there was no guidance available.
  • Alignment of control group deletion rate with baseline, to check whether the article creation considered for the experiment is representative of the broader picture.
  • Break down results by type of topic to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of guidance.

Red links with criteria (T420385)

Red links.png (3,270×900 px, 502 KB)

Homepage (T421224)

Homepage.png (2,683×900 px, 275 KB)

Direct access to special page (excluded from experiment results)

Direct.png (1,605×900 px, 151 KB)

Outline pages (T420457) (excluded from experiment results)

Outlines.png (1,605×900 px, 147 KB)


Other ideas for the future

Some ideas that were discussed during early explorations and we can consider for the future:

  • Contribute menu. The Contribute menu (T322740) is intended to list contribution activities and make them accessible from the contributions page. The option to create a new article can be a simple and persistent entry point to support.
  • Link from relevant wikiproject/campaign/event pages. On community collaborative initiatives such as wiki projects that focus on supported article types, a link to contribute can be included that works as an entry point for the experiment.
  • Invite to expand with a section after an article. For articles of a supported type, an option to expand with common sections can be shown below the article contents.
  • (feel free to suggest more ideas)

Event Timeline

Observations on current entry points

I took a look into some of the existing entry points to create an article on mobile for the pilot wikis (T414448). Some observations:

  • Red links provide an invite to create an article with access to mobile Visual Editor.
  • Searching for non-existing articles leads to results peage that, unlike desktop, not always provides an option to create an article.
  • Article Wizard is available in the pilot wikis, but entry points for it and usage seem very limited in most cases. Main exception being Turkish: with Article Wizard receiving higher number of views and an option to create new content with it is visible at the top of the main page of Turkish Wikipedia.
  • Two wikis (Portuguese and Turkish) show a custom dialog when reaching Visual Editor for the first time. Portuguese provides general editing guidance, and the Turkish one is empty.

Red links

Red links in an article provide access to article creation. On mobile web for the pilot wikis, when a red link is present in an article, users can tap on it and a panel is shown at the bottom of the screen to provide them the option to create a new article, which will lead them to Mobile Visual Editor.

Invite for article creation after taping a red link"Create page" leads to Visual Editor on mobile web
ja.wikipedia.org_wiki_%E3%82%AA%E3%82%A2%E3%82%B7%E3%82%B9(iPhone SE).png (375×667 px, 148 KB)
ja.wikipedia.org_w_index.php_title=%E7%AD%89%E6%B8%A9%E7%B7%9A&action=edit&redlink=1(iPhone SE).png (375×667 px, 16 KB)

For some cases, as part of Content Translation entry points an invite to create the article by translating is proposed as an alternative once users reach Visual Editor. As captured in T298084, this happens when the system is confident that the suggested source article and language are relevant for the user, and while there is no content on the editing surface (once the user starts typing, the invite won't be visible even if the user hides the keyboard).

bn.wikipedia.org_wiki_%E0%A6%86%E0%A6%A1%E0%A6%BC%E0%A7%81_action=edit&redlink=1(iPhone SE).png (750×1,334 px, 99 KB)

Search results

When searching for an article on Wikipedia first users get a quick list of results. If their intended result is not there, they can access to the full list of search results (advanced search) through the "Search for pages containingX" option, or typing the enter key. In the advanced search step, the article being searched may show as a red link, allowing for article creation. We have observed that for some users the red link wa snot showing on mobile while it did on desktop for the same user. In addition, some other users observed the red link on mobile. This suggests that the criteria to show the red link may depend on user permissions, but also the way it is applied seems to be inconsistent across mobile and desktop.

Quick search on mobileAdvanced search on mobile with no option to create articleAdvanced search on desktop with red link to create article
pt.wikipedia.org_wiki_Wikip%C3%A9dia_P%C3%A1gina_principal(Wiki Mobile).png (320×568 px, 50 KB)
pt.wikipedia.org_w_index.php_search=Kitowok&title=Especial%3APesquisar&wprov=acrw1_-1(iPhone SE).png (375×667 px, 94 KB)
pt.wikipedia.org_w_index.php_title=Especial_Pesquisar&search=Kitowok(Wiki Tablet).png (1,024×768 px, 157 KB)

Direct URL creation

When accessing a URL for a page that does not exist (e.g., https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitowok ), all pilot wikis show a page that indicates that contents are missing (see example below) with an option to create them with a "create this page" or the pencil icon. Creating the page leads to visual editor. Although, Article Wizard is present in all pilot wikis, the page for a non-existing article does not provide access to it.

URL access to a missing non-existing page"Create this page" leads to Visual Editor on mobile
bn.wikipedia.org_wiki_Kitowok(iPhone SE).png (375×667 px, 78 KB)
pt.wikipedia.org_w_index.php_title=Kitowok&action=edit(iPhone SE) (1).png (375×667 px, 20 KB)

For most wikis, the experience looks as illustrated above. The only exceptions has been Portuguese and Turkish where landing to Visual Editor shows a dialog the first time. For Portuguese, some general guidance is shown the first time, but for Turkish, the message is empty.

Mobile Visual Editor in Portuguese WikipediaMobile Visual Editor in Turkish Wikipedia
pt.wikipedia.org_w_index.php_title=Kitowok&action=edit(iPhone SE).png (375×667 px, 75 KB)
tr.wikipedia.org_w_index.php_title=Kitowok&action=edit(iPhone SE).png (375×667 px, 16 KB)

For reference, on English Wikipedia a custom empty page is shown with a few more options (example), including access to Visual Editor for page creation ("start the Kitowok article" link in the example) as well as links to Article Wizard and Requested Articles.

en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Kitowok(iPhone SE) (1).png (376×1,555 px, 330 KB)

Existing workflows for article creation

Article Wizard is available in all pilot wikis. Using the pageviews tool to look at the traffic of the page on mobile web during the last year, Turkish and Persian were the only wikis where monthly views for the Article Wizard reached 1K, whereas for the rest of the pilot wikis views were below 200. So we may want to investigate where the article

Article Wizard monthly views in ArabicArticle Wizard monthly views in BengaliArticle Wizard monthly views in JapaneseArticle Wizard monthly views in PersianArticle Wizard monthly views in PortugueseArticle Wizard monthly views in Turkish
pageviews.wmcloud.org__project=ar.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-web&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-01&end=2026-01&pages=%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%.png (1,024×768 px, 602 KB)
pageviews.wmcloud.org__project=bn.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-web&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-01&end=2026-01&pages=%E0%A6%89%E0%A6%87%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A1%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%AF%E0%A6%BC%E0%A6%BE_%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%B.png (1,024×768 px, 612 KB)
pageviews.wmcloud.org__project=ja.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-web&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-01&end=2026-01&pages=Wikipedia_%E8%A8%98%E4%BA%8B%E3%82%A6%E3%82%A3%E3%82%B6%E3%83%BC%E3%83%89(Wiki Tablet).png (1,024×768 px, 595 KB)
pageviews.wmcloud.org__project=fa.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-web&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-01&end=2026-01&pages=%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%A9%DB%8C%E2%80%8C%D9%BE%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%A7_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%AF_%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%.png (1,024×768 px, 596 KB)
pageviews.wmcloud.org__project=pt.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-web&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-01&end=2026-01&pages=Wikip%C3%A9dia_Guia_de_cria%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_artigos(Wiki Tablet).png (1,024×768 px, 618 KB)
pageviews.wmcloud.org__project=tr.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-web&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-01&end=2026-01&pages=Vikipedi_Madde_sihirbaz%C4%B1(Wiki Tablet).png (1,024×768 px, 628 KB)

Based on the above, we may want to check which are the pages linking to ArticleWizard on Turkish and on Persian. On a quick inspection a couple of relevant instances were found:

  • On Turkish there is an invite to create a new article from the project homepage that links to Article Wizard.
  • On Persian, some templates to warn about neutral point of view provide as one of the options to create a new article, which points to the wizard.
On Turkish Wikipedia home pageOn Persian Wikipedia templates
tr.wikipedia.org_wiki_Anasayfa(Wiki Tablet).png (1,024×768 px, 325 KB)
fa.wikipedia.org_wiki_%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%B2%DB%8C_%D9%85%DA%A9%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C(Wiki Tablet).png (1,024×768 px, 403 KB)
(Machine translated:)
Screenshot 2026-02-16 at 13.25.36.png (1,118×350 px, 135 KB)
(Machine translated:)
Screenshot 2026-02-16 at 13.25.23.png (946×256 px, 71 KB)

Proposed entry points

After the previous investigation in T414535#11620008, the design exploration and iterating it based on feedback, I'm sharing an initial proposal for entry points for Article Guidance.

The proposal covers two sets of entry points:

  • For the experiment. Three entry points supporting different situations:
    1. Red links (with criteria). Red links represent missing pages identified by the community. A criteria based on the specific page or category will determine which redlinks are part of the experiment.
    2. Search for missing pages. After searching for a specific topic not covered yet, the user can try to create it. This supports any topic th euser had in mind, whether it may or may not be relevant for the community.
    3. Turkish Wikipedia homepage. Turkish Wikipedia has an existing visible entry point for article creation on their home page, that connects with Article Wizard.
  • For the community to try and adjust the guidance (results excluded from the experiment). To allow communities (in pilot wikis and beyond) to try the feature, provide guidance for new types of articles and quickly check how it works, we propose two entry points:
    1. Direct access to special page. Direct access to the Article Guidance feature to try it.
    2. Outline pages. Communities define guidance for a specific article type in an outline page. Providing an option to try the creation of contents using the guideline will facilitate the cycle of adjusting and trying the feature for communities.

Each entry point is detailed in the corresponding sections below. For each of them there is a common set of measurements that will help understand how are they working.

Aspects to observe:

  • Percentage of article creation left out of the experiment.
  • Percentage of topics in the new guided experience for which there was no guidance available.
  • Alignment of control group deletion rate with baseline, to check whether the article creation considered for the experiment is representative of the broader picture.
  • Break down results by type of topic to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of guidance.

Red links (with criteria)

Red links.png (3,270×900 px, 502 KB)

Search for missing pages

Search.png (3,474×900 px, 437 KB)

Homepage

Homepage.png (2,683×900 px, 276 KB)

Direct access to special page (excluded from experiment results)

Direct.png (1,605×900 px, 151 KB)

Outline pages (excluded from experiment results)

Outlines.png (1,605×900 px, 147 KB)

After further investigation, it seems that the search page on mobile has the option to create a new article hidden in most cases. In addition, given that such option is represented as a red link, it can be supported by the general "Red links (with criteria)" case. Updating the proposal at the ticket description to avoid confusions.

Contribute menu. The Contribute menu (T322740) is intended to list contribution activities and make them accessible from the contributions page. The option to create a new article can be a simple and persistent entry point to support.

An idea for later, instead of Contribute, would be to add this to PersonalDashboard, which we're aiming to be a centralised venue for contribution opportunities. There, we might want to explore providing users with suggestions for which pages to create, which then launches this experience.

Nikerabbit set the point value for this task to 8.Apr 2 2026, 10:13 AM