Page MenuHomePhabricator

dewiki: Exclude paid editing accounts from editor/autoreview autopromotion
Open, Stalled, Needs TriagePublic

Description

In dewiki, we are currently considering feasible ways to exclude paid editing account from autopromotion to advanced roles, which would automatically mark their edits as reviewed.
This could be achieved by adding a group declared (or similar), allowing sysops to grant and remove it, and adjusting the editor/autoreview autopromotion rule to skip users in this group.
(Alternatively to changing autopromotion rules, one could technically add a group which revokes all privileges associated with editor/autoreview.)

Additionally, this would have the upside to make significantly more obvious using group membership, which accounts are declared as paid editing.

If we reach community consensus for a configuration change like this, would it be adopted, or do sysadmins see significant nogos in this proposal?

Event Timeline

Aklapper changed the task status from Open to Stalled.Jan 19 2026, 11:15 AM

one could technically add a group which revokes all privileges associated with editor/autoreview

See: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgRevokePermissions

Ultimately, both way to implement this have upsides and downsides.
If one would like to be able to make exceptions to this rule while keeping the group membership meaningful, disabling autopromoting would be better.
By contrast, the revoke approach could allow to revoke additional permissions (e.g. editsemiprotected), while keeping others in place (e.g. rollback), if this is desired.

Actually, I would be more happy to stop autopromotion for accounts in a certain category (per wiki, configured via system message) since that needs no maintenance efforts.

For a group solution, we would need to evaluate template transclusions or category every two or three weeks and each fresh account will be assigned to paidediting group by sysop. Then autopromotion could consider this group. That needs permanent human analysis and operation. However, a group paidediting would be pretty for evaluation by tools, and is visible on edit analysis, e.g. by xtools.