Page MenuHomePhabricator

Create a community configurable way to include links within Edit Check/Suggestion Cards
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

This task involves the work of creating a community configurable way to include links within Edit Check/Suggestion Cards.

Stories

  • As an experienced volunteer encountering an Edit Suggestion, I'd value seeing the specific policy/guideline it is based off of, so that I can ensure editing interfaces remain in alignment with the consensus volunteers have documented in Wikipedia policies and style guidelines.
  • As a newcomer who encounters an Edit Suggestion they are curious about, I want to know the specific policy/guideline it is based off so that I can feel more confident I am responding to the suggestion in question in a way that is aligned with what the project specifies.

Open questions

  • 1. Does the linked text need to be included within the card description? Are we satisfied with it being "bolted on" as a Learn more link at the end?
  • 2. What will we do in cases where no local policy/guideline page exists? Omit a link entirely? Offer a generic link? Something else?

Requirements

WIP...

References

Event Timeline

ppelberg triaged this task as High priority.Feb 2 2026, 6:56 PM

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/VisualEditor/+/1234377 made it so that wikitext in all the description messages will be expanded, so the existing method of editing messages on-wiki will let people add links wherever they want. We also have URL-only messages that can be overridden for the checks where we have a link in the default message.

ppelberg claimed this task.

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/VisualEditor/+/1234377 made it so that wikitext in all the description messages will be expanded, so the existing method of editing messages on-wiki will let people add links wherever they want. We also have URL-only messages that can be overridden for the checks where we have a link in the default message.

The functionality this ticket is describing is already implemented, per what David shared above.