Page MenuHomePhabricator

Reduce tendency of Add a Link to suggest overlinks
Open, Needs TriagePublic

Description

User story & summary:
As a Wikipedian, I want the "Add a link" task to better align with the Manual of Style (MOS) guidelines and the specific norms of my wiki.

Primary concern: The current link suggestion algorithm frequently recommends links of common/generic topics, such as common occupations, languages, geographic features like oceans or continents (Q5107), religions, nationalities, everyday words like "river" or "aircraft", country names (Q6256), etc. These would be considered overlinks on many wikis, going against the Manual of Style.

We should prevent these suggestions to reduce patroller burden and improve compliance with community standards. T415623 is one possible intervention.

Event Timeline

Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald Transcript

Hey,

I think one solution could be adding a pre-calculating incoming_link_count of a page to the dataset. So that we can use it for filtering.

  • Do not suggest a link to a page if it already has more than N links.
  • Do not suggest a link to a page if the number of links to the page is in X percentile.

We can pre-calculate N and X as well and if needed we can make it configurable.

Hmm, @OKarakaya-WMF, would there be any way to test out how such a filter would affect the suggestions?

My instinct is that that approach could be challenging, as the pages that need to be avoided to prevent overlinking are the pages on the most generic topics, not the pages with the most incoming links, and those datasets do not overlap all that well. Here is a (dated) list of the pages with the most incoming links on en-wiki — some (such as "United States") are definitely generic, but others have lots of links for idiosyncratic reasons (e.g. "IUCN Red List" appears because it's linked from the animal infobox as part of the line on a species' conservation status) and would be fully appropriate links to suggest (which is indeed why they've been used so much).

One alternative might be to use the Vital Articles list, which is closer to (although still not precisely) a list of the most generic topics. I'd say that any non-biographical article at level 3 or above would be pretty safe to exclude as an overlink. The VA list is maintained by en-wiki, although it's not intended to have any English-language focus; the list of articles every Wikipedia should have is at Meta but is less well-maintained.