I've shared the new Suggestions copies proposed in the task's description, following the new copies structure proposed in T414987.

Link to a specific page	This link may point to a general page. Help readers find the right topic by linking to a more specific page.

I don't think we should avoid the terminology "disambiguation" and replace it with "general". While "disambiguation" is a little confusing, it is widely used within Wikipedia and introducing a new term for it could me more confusing.

We don't need "may" - we know it definitely links to a disambiguation page.

I think we also need the "more" qualifier in the title "Link to a specific page", as a disambiguation page is already a specific page, it's just less specific than the targets :)

externalLink Edit external link External links should not appear in the body of an article. Help readers stay focused on the content by removing or relocating the external link. Edit link

As the description indicates, the primary action should be "Remove link". If the users wants to relocate the link instead they would do that by cut and pate, not by opening the link editor, so having that as the option is not very helpful.

Button 2
Skip

I think "skip", especially on mobile, does not convey the destructive nature of pressing it. Specifically that the suggestion will go away and never be shown again in that edit session. "Skip" suggests to me that I may be able to come back to it, whereas I think "dismiss" is clearer in that regard. Other options might be "Ignore" or "Decline".

Redirect link

This doesn't follow the rule of using action-oriented titles. I'm not sure if we need to be 100% rigid on that though...

Help readers reach the intended article directly by linking to the final target.

Fixing the redirect link doesn't acutally help users get to the right place as the redirect already works fine. The fix maybe helps editors, or readers who hover on the link to look at the page title, but maybe for this one we just leave out the reason as it's a bit too technical?

Fix year link | Fix link

There are actually two fix buttons of equal priority for this suggestion as the user has to work out which of the link target or the link label is correct:

I would guess that 90% of the time it's the label that has been updated without updating the link target, but we don't want to offer the incorrect fix for those other cases.

addReference Add a citation

As we aren't using separate copy for check mode and suggestion mode yet, updating this would change check mode as well. I'm ok with that but we should be aware...

As agreed in editing team, let's review and discuss the proposed copies in this Google doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iQig8TDI9oMoh9jirt31g_L_1GC-MVX4WZCUaCWP5xY/edit?tab=t.0

Patch updating the copy is here: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/VisualEditor/+/1235795

It adjusts everything from the table apart from addReference and convertReference.