Potentially Regression related to 023e989? The edit seems to have added a reject to the "missing summary" flow that wasn't there before. cc @Dreamy_Jazz; I currently don't have much experience working with this file so I'm not sure of the consequences of just having that flow resolve the promise instead, though a cursory glance at the context (T407202) and the tests added tells me this is not something you'd want.

Yeah, looks like a Regression caused by that commit

Change #1237946 had a related patch set uploaded (by DLynch; author: DLynch):

[mediawiki/extensions/VisualEditor@master] init.mw.ArticleTarget: adjust when saveDeferred is rejected

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1237946

Change #1237946 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/VisualEditor@master] init.mw.ArticleTarget: adjust when saveDeferred is rejected

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1237946

✅ No overlay

⚠️ 2 icons: 1 info and a warning banner. New ticket will be created to track this

I checked into that a bit, and it's specifically a problem on the beta cluster. It's got an overridden missingsummary message that explicitly includes that big (i) icon. So this is a case of "the VE save dialog is displaying exactly what the on-wiki overrides are asking it to display". 🤷🏻

It's fine on e.g. enwiki:

In T416818#11612275, @DLynch wrote:

I checked into that a bit, and it's specifically a problem on the beta cluster. It's got an overridden missingsummary message that explicitly includes that big (i) icon. So this is a case of "the VE save dialog is displaying exactly what the on-wiki overrides are asking it to display". 🤷🏻

It's fine on e.g. enwiki:

Interesting