Helloo, just checking in - I assume this would be done closer to 15.5 instead of 30.04?

Yes, but we can hopefully get to this in the next two weeks. Can you move it into the backlog and position it in regards to the priority to your other tasks, @Ifrahkhanyaree_WMDE?

It's been in the prioritized position, did that a couple of weeks ago! 2 weeks sounds good, thank you

Hey hey, what does the timeline look like for picking this up?

Hi good morning 👋 I'm hopeful that we can pick this up on Monday next week :)

Just as an fyi - I'm looking into this myself :) and will continue it post my vacation

Adding some notes (so I don't forget), after a short exploration this morning:

WDQS

1. Help button click: no event / network calls. The user is linked directly to the linked page. As such, must check if there is a data table for page views of this page, where we could ascertain the referer as being from WDQS? But please note, there's also a help link banner at the top of the page... So cannot differentiate with referer
2. Same as point 1 for help dropdown menu.
3. Same as point 1 for tools button.
4. Same as point 1 for tools dropdown menu.
5. There is a network call for this (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikidata:Data_access) - need to find corresponding table. However, the footer links are tiny!
6. Not sure what this is referring to.
7. There is a network call for this (https://developer.wikimedia.org/) - need to find corresponding table.
8. For menu - are we meaning every click?

Am wondering, if instead of looking for clicks - we re-frame this slightly to look at page views and referrers. Then and/or create segmentation of users (anonymised) who view this content and then go on to create queries (to then infer the resources used have been reliable / useful)?

Also looked at event.mediawiki_web_ui_actions -do we have any knowledge about this? Also _interactions (table appears empty) for 2026... And then there is a frequent event for w3c.reportingapi.network_error - when a user clicks on items here. However, I think this is only sending info when there is an error.

Final note for clarification: what's the expected output of this task?

@catherine.kelsey.wmde it might be easiest to go over this in a quick meeting since I went through this originally with Andrew.

In a quick answer: I'd be fine with page views and referrers only, if that's what we have. It also all doesn't have to be "exact", it's to get an understanding of what data we have, what for and to continue to track that in a superset graph (there is a linked task).
And for missing things, I'd like to collect a list of what is not there, prioritise if we really do want tracking there and request tracking from the WMF for those.

Hey @Ifrahkhanyaree_WMDE sure - have put something in for tomorrow! Was just adding here my notes ahead of this :)

• Metric check documentation here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XsJCTjyLCJIB_7MCfOY6nFWSRik9l02HXTpRL0PBr-8/edit?gid=2093449930#gid=2093449930
• Follow up ticket here: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T417763
• Meeting with Ifrah & Elisha booked for 16/7/2026

Missing pages for page views and referrers:

• https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wikibase_GraphQL
• https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:REST_API
• https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Introduction
• https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Development