Page MenuHomePhabricator

Should some additional VisualEditor-related projects be added to the @Maintenance_bot rule that auto-tags the #VisualEditor umbrella project?
Open, In Progress, LowPublic

Description

The @Maintenance_bot rule to auto-tag some public tasks with the VisualEditor umbrella project is currently defined as:

{
    # H10 - see T76954
    'add': 'VisualEditor',
    'in': [
        'VisualEditor-ContentEditable',
        'VisualEditor-ContentLanguage',
        'VisualEditor-CopyPaste',
        'VisualEditor-DataModel',
        'VisualEditor-EditingTools',
        'VisualEditor-Initialisation',
        'VisualEditor-InterfaceLanguage',
        'VisualEditor-MediaWiki',
        'VisualEditor-MediaWiki-Links',
        'VisualEditor-MediaWiki-Media',
        'VisualEditor-MediaWiki-Mobile',
        'VisualEditor-MediaWiki-References',
        'VisualEditor-MediaWiki-Templates',
        'VisualEditor-Performance',
        'VisualEditor-Tables',
        'TemplateData',
        'VisualEditor-MediaWiki-Plugins',
        'VisualEditor-LanguageTool',
        'VisualEditor-Links',
        'VisualEditor-Media',
        'VisualEditor-MediaWiki-2017WikitextEditor',
        'VisualEditor-VisualDiffs',
    ],
},

My question is -- should the following VE-related projects also be added to this rule?

Details

Related Changes in GitLab:
TitleReferenceAuthorSource BranchDest Branch
project_grouper: Add 5 extra VE-related projectsladsgroup/Phabricator-maintenance-bot!37asmartkittenasmartkitten-master-patch-35327master
Customize query in GitLab

Event Timeline

A_smart_kitten changed the task status from Open to In Progress.Sun, May 17, 12:15 PM
A_smart_kitten claimed this task.
A_smart_kitten triaged this task as Low priority.

Given that the mentioned Phab projects do seem to be related to VisualEditor AFAICS (for three of them, due to them starting with the prefix VisualEditor-, & for two of them, due to their code appearing to be within the mediawiki/extensions/VisualEditor repo), I'm gonna boldly propose to answer my own question with 'yes' :p