Page MenuHomePhabricator

General outline is used instead of a more specific one
Closed, DuplicatePublic

Description

As part of the Article Guidance work (T396029), outlines can be defined for specific article types based on Wikidata items. Normally the Wikidata hierarchy is followed, and it is possible to define a general outline for "museums" and a specific one that applies only to "art museums".
However, as reported by an editor, the outline created in the test instance for "Fossil' is not used when starting an article about a fossil such as "Trilobita" (Q17170) despite that it is an instance of "fossil taxon (Q23038290) which is the Wikidata item attached to the "Fossil" outline. Instead, the more general "animal" outline is used by the system.

b24e11a4f1.catalyst.wmcloud.org_wiki_Special_NewArticle(Wiki Mobile) (18).png (320×568 px, 67 KB)

This ticket proposes to investigate why that is the case and which options exist to better adjust the system to pick the most specific outline.

Event Timeline

Pginer-WMF triaged this task as Medium priority.

This might be because they're not properly a nested hierarchy, with "Fossil taxon" being a subclass of "Taxon" (Q16521) and "Animal" being an instance of "Taxon". This kind of makes sense, as fossil taxa can also include plants, fungi, god-knows-what, etc. However, given that what we can say about a fossil organism is very different from what we can say about an extant one, it makes sense to have different outlines structured that way (I consulted with folks from WikiProject Palaeontology to make sure).

Ideally, it could be great if there was a way to introduce custom logic between outlines, although that will probably be way too ambitious for just this fix.

Pginer-WMF raised the priority of this task from Medium to High.May 7 2026, 12:56 PM