I believe that's intentional. While it is possible to get admin permissions with a lower edit count / account age than what's required or TAIV, admins need to go through an RfA process which ensures that there's community trust.

Johannes in small Projekts is this only a discussion.
Example: https://iu.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E1%90%85%E1%90%83%E1%91%AD%E1%90%B1%E1%91%8E%E1%90%8A:%E1%96%83%E1%92%A1%E1%92%8B%E1%96%85

All I would have to do is write a request, and according to the guidelines, I can make the SRP request after 7 days, unless someone objects which is verly unlikely given the lack of active users.

It's that easy in inactive projects.

The potential concern is crats in any wikis can technically grant any user sysop and crat with no discussion at all, and this did happen in some small wikis. We have no technical way to enforce a discussion before granting. Some potential solutions are:

• Technically prevent granting sysop/crat to user lower than TAIV threshold (while stewards can override). Not a good solution since this means flagging adminbots may often require steward action.
• Disable access to IP Reveal for sysops and crats lower than TAIV threshold. Stewards can still manually add them to TAIV group. This may require splitting checkuser-temporary-account right.

Small wikis (especially newly created ones) sometimes simply don't have any users with enough edits meeting TAIV – but they might still need admins fighting vandalism and requiring TAIV access. Given that stewards are granting admin permissions via SRP it's unnecessarily bureaucratic to require those admins to also apply for stewards granting them a TAIV exemption. If we don't trust them with TAIV, they shouldn't get admin permissions.

If a wiki is large enough to have their own crats, they should be trusted to make decisions about granting sysop permissions even if that includes TAIV.

Some small wiki has crats for historical reason and sometimes it causes a lot of troubles. Before U4C exists many RFCs in Meta concerns potential issues of wiki governance (e.g. a crat becomes de facto dictator of wiki). See also https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_governance_audit

Johannnes newprojects have users with activity in incubator and stewards can override the restrictions for this user.
New projects use SRP for user permission assignment anyway.