Deployment plan

#TODO

Story

As an experienced editor motivated to ensure the claims on Wikipedia are supported by the sources they are accompanied by, I want to be made aware when a published claim may not be substantiated by its associated reference, so that I can more efficiently identify claim-source pairs worth investigating further, improving, or potentially, removing it.

Open questions

• 1. As T425808 demonstrates, there are many instances where a citation might contain multiple URLs and for those URLs to be embedded within templates. How will this Suggestion decide which URL(s) to evaluate?
• 2. There can be cases where a reference is wrapped within a template and for that template to generate a URL and for that URL not to be expressed within the wikitext source. How will this Suggestion generate those URLs and subsequently evaluate them?
  • Potentially unblocked by T425808.
• 3. .

Meta

• Link to relevant wish, policy, guideline, template, etc.: WP:Verify
• Suggestion scope: English Wikipedia

Requirements '

Meta

• Default configuration
  • maximumEditcount: N/A
  • minimumEditcount: 250 edits
  • Type: Suggestion and/or Check: Suggestion
• Detection heuristic:

User experience

• Card design
  • Title: @ppelberg TODO
  • Description (≤2 sentences): @ppelberg TODO
  • Calls to action
    • Button name: @ppelberg TODO
    • Button name: @ppelberg TODO
• Success toast

Instrumentation
As with all Edit Checks and Suggestions, we will want to know:

• Any time a Suggestion of this type is activated within an edit session
• Any time someone views a Suggestion of this type within an edit session
• Any time someone engages with a Suggestion and how they engage with it

References

• T399642: [Signal] Identify cases where reference does not support published claim
• T414816: [WE1.7.3] Exploration of automated verifiability checks