Page MenuHomePhabricator

Add aliases for `Special:Purge`
Closed, DeclinedPublicFeature

Description

Feature summary:

Add aliases for Special:Purge

Use case(s):

Many other special pages have the form verb+object, or verb. It's inconsistent and users may guess wrong if they haven't memorised the names of special pages. In the case of purge, we can talk about "purging the cache" or "purging the page" or even "purging the page cache."

Good first task

There's only a minor change required here to languages / messages / MessagesEn.php to add these aliases. It's literally a change to one line of code to add it to the array:

	'Purge'                      => [ 'Purge' ],

Currently at line 522 to:

	'Purge'                      => [ 'Purge', 'PurgeCache', 'PurgePage', 'PurgePageCache' ],

Details

Related Changes in Gerrit:

Event Timeline

Change #1289156 had a related patch set uploaded (by VadymTS1; author: VadymTS1):

[mediawiki/core@master] [core] Add aliases for `Special:Purge`

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1289156

It's inconsistent and users may guess wrong

Is this based on data or is this an assumption? Has someone asked for these longer names due to not remembering the original short page name?
I'm not a fan of adding more complexity, maintenance costs, increased ambiguity in conversations about the same special page for no clear reasons.

Pppery subscribed.

Agreed with Aklapper.

@Aklapper @Bugreporter2 My patch is loaded, please let me know if I need to abandon it.

neriah subscribed.

According to what @Aklapper said above, there is no support for the change.

@VadymTS1 I think you can abandon the patch.

Bugreporter2 awarded a token.

Please don't listen to that.

There is clearly consensus against doing this.

Bugreporter2 awarded a token.

The usual klaptrap. Special:PurgePage is required as a minimum.

Change #1289156 abandoned by VadymTS1:

[mediawiki/core@master] [core] Add aliases for `Special:Purge`

Reason:

Phab ticket declined

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1289156

@Bugreporter2 You could consider replying to raised concerns by picking them up and exchanging arguments; I listed a few in T426700#11934561 above.
What's best for the MediaWiki software and its userbase is usually unrelated to your favorite Donkey Kong characters. :) Thanks for considering.