Background
There are a few remaining unprefixed CSS classes: is-hidden, is-visible, is-cooldown and fly-heart-box/fly-heart. These were leftovers from the static HTML and should have already been transformed in the original patch adding to WikimediaCustomizations.
Goal
In order to follow our CSS coding guidelines and not risk side-effects, let's prefix them.
Acceptance criteria for done
- No unprefixed class is remaining in 'styles.less'
BDD
Feature: Donor badge CSS classes are namespaced
Scenario: No unprefixed leftover classes ship in the badge stylesheet
Given the donor badge styles are loaded on a treatment pageview
When I inspect the donor badge CSS rules
Then is-hidden, is-visible, is-cooldown, fly-heart-box and fly-heart
And each appears only in its ext-wc- prefixed form
And no bare (unprefixed) selector for any of them is presentTest Plan
Test Case 1: Leftover classes are prefixed with ext-wc-
On a treatment-b-simple pageview, scan document.styleSheets cssRules for each token.
AC1: is-hidden, is-visible, is-cooldown, fly-heart-box, fly-heart appear as .ext-wc-<token> selectors.
AC2: zero bare (unprefixed) selectors for any of those tokens are present in the loaded stylesheet.
Test Results
| AC | Status | Details for test run T427956#12008055 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✅ | all five tokens present only as ext-wc- selectors — see T427956_beta_AC1_1.png |
| 2 | ✅ | 0 bare selectors for is-hidden/is-visible/is-cooldown/fly-heart-box/fly-heart |
