Page MenuHomePhabricator

Revise Tone: populate suggestions for new predicted topics
Open, Needs TriagePublic

Description

User story & summary:

As a editor on Wikipedia, I want to review Revise Tone suggestions related to more topics so that I can improve article neutrality across the wikis and have plenty of tasks to work on.

Background & research:

This task is important because enwiki has completed all Revise Tone suggestions, and ideally we have enough tasks to support newer editors.

Questions:

Based on the ORES article topics, here's a very rough, intuition-based ranking of which topic areas might be more likely to contain opportunities for tone or neutrality improvements. This is not based on empirical data and should be treated as a hypothesis rather than a conclusion. It is not intended to suggest that articles in any particular topic are inherently more biased or less encyclopedic than others.

Likelihood of non-neutral writingTopicsWhy
Very HighBiography, Politics and government, Philosophy and religion, History, Military and warfareThese frequently involve contentious subjects, ideological viewpoints, living people, or historical interpretation. Articles often require careful attribution and neutral framing.
HighBusiness and economics, Society, Education, Media (Books, Films, Television, Music, Video games, Entertainment, Software), Internet culture, SportsThese topics often attract fan-like language, promotional wording, recentism, or subjective evaluations. Articles about companies, schools, athletes, and entertainment are common targets for promotional editing.
ModerateVisual arts, Architecture, Fashion, Performing arts, Literature, Food and drink, TransportationThese can include subjective descriptions ("iconic," "beautiful," "renowned") but are generally less controversial than politics or biographies.
LowerBiology, Chemistry, Mathematics, Physics, Earth and environment, Computing, Engineering, Libraries and information, Space, TechnologyScientific and technical topics tend to be more factual and are often written in a more objective style, although articles about emerging technologies or companies can still contain promotional language.
LowestGeography, regional geography topics, species, physical geographyThese articles are typically descriptive and fact-based. While they can contain local bias or nationalistic framing, they generally present fewer neutrality issues.
  • Should we manually review a small sample of new suggestions?
Acceptance Criteria:

TBD (based on open questions)

Given [preconditions]
When [user action]
Then [outcome resulting from actions taken in the when clause]
All tasks should also meet the Growth Team’s task completion definition.

Event Timeline