In T437980#12323726, @Rsilvola wrote:

Hello @dkertesz,

Could you please specify for what purpose you need access to the security@ mailing-list?
Also, please include your supervisor in this request, for their approval.

Thanks!

Hi @Rsilvola: @dkertesz is joining the Traffic team as an SRE, so he needs to have access in order to do his regular work and as part of his on-call duties. Approving as his manager.

In T437980#12324609, @Rsilvola wrote:

SRE on-call duty inherently meets the criteria for ongoing, proactive, and wide access to security tickets, as set in the policy.

This task was just for security@ access, not Phabricator security access.

I think SREs should have access to both, by default. If a justification is required for audit purposes, that's fine but unless there is something else in Security that I am missing, I am happy to update the checklist to suggest that SREs should ask for access to both things, since we need it for on-call work.

I know this task is not the place to discuss that, so I will set that up offline.

Hi folks, checking if something else is pending from Traffic's end, including approvals, for this?

Thank you @sbassett! That is filed in T438305.