Currently we have two pages describing the MediaWiki release process:
- https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WikiReleaseTeam/Release_process
- https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_checklist
We should have just one process in just one page.
Currently we have two pages describing the MediaWiki release process:
We should have just one process in just one page.
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | Mglaser | T537 Wiki Release Team October 2014 goals | |||
| Resolved | Mglaser | T481 A single page describing the MediaWiki release checklist |
Here's a draft of the page: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WikiReleaseTeam/Release_process
please comment. This will replace the Release checklist https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_checklist and become the central tracker for the release process of any upcoming release.
I missed the steps for updating MW.o, but once I went to modify the page, I found them -- I missed them the first time because I didn't know where to look until I went and found the templates to modify and then saw they were already there.
Looks good to me.
@Qgil, if you don't have any problems with the task being closed, I will close it later today.
I'd like to see the draft merged into https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_checklist before this Task is closed. Please and thank you! :)
And perhaps split out that second list in T481#6206 into a new Task?
@Mglaser, could you merge the release process and the release checklist as requested by Quiddity, or as you think best?
Since I used the Release_process page yesterday, I think it should replace the _checklist page.
Note that I didn't keep a log of my work, unlike what @Mglaser has done the past few times. I'll keep one for RC.0 today.
@MarkAHershberger: someone pointed out that there are people watching the checklist. so it might be better to use that one. I do not really have any preference.
I suggest we make the checklist a redirect to the process page. @Quiddity, @Qgil, is that ok with you?
I would still strongly encourage merging into the Older page (the checklist), as that has 3x as many watchlisters.
It's also a good general rule. It makes everything smoother, by discouraging doc forks/abandonment.
If we use the older page (the checklist), then the content of the new one would just replace it. Does that sound ok, @Quiddity?
No, that is not ok. We'll have to come up with some way to merge the pages. I just looked at the page and saw that it is referenced in T480