Special:Random isn't very random.
It'd be nice if we could use Elastic Search to do more randomness
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
See Also:
Reedy | |
May 15 2014, 7:32 PM |
F13672: RandomOverload.png | |
Nov 22 2014, 3:14 AM |
Special:Random isn't very random.
It'd be nice if we could use Elastic Search to do more randomness
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
See Also:
Change 133606 had a related patch set uploaded by Chad:
Power Special:Random from Elasticsearch
Special:Random is now powered by Cirrus on wikis that have it.
It uses a function score query[0] with random_score's seed using a munged int version of the random seed we used already. Looks random enough.
"Hi. I was using the Special:Random/File tool for a long time on rowiki, in order to fish for unfree images and candidates for Commons. Last days when I accessed the tool, it returned me only Commons files. Tried @ enwiki - same drill"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)
(In reply to Derk-Jan Hartman from comment #5)
"Hi. I was using the Special:Random/File tool for a long time on rowiki, in
order to fish for unfree images and candidates for Commons. Last days when I
accessed the tool, it returned me only Commons files. Tried @ enwiki - same
drill"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)
Probably should be filed as a new bug and marked as a regression...
(In reply to Sam Reed (reedy) from comment #6)
(In reply to Derk-Jan Hartman from comment #5)
"Hi. I was using the Special:Random/File tool for a long time on rowiki, in
order to fish for unfree images and candidates for Commons. Last days when I
accessed the tool, it returned me only Commons files. Tried @ enwiki - same
drill"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)
Probably should be filed as a new bug and marked as a regression...
Done Bug 66643.
Created attachment 15950
Special:Random caused some load
Note, reverted on Wikimedia wikis for now. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/146615/
Attached: