Hi, what does ""as per the standards followed"" mean? What is the bug here? It's unclear from reading this ticket what the actual problem is. :(

Also see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_report_a_bug for general info.

pr4tiklahoti wrote:

Hi Andre, by standards, I mean the general guidelines and principles followed on MediaWiki. If you look into the code, I have just given trivial names which came to my mind. This needs to be fixed to make the code production-level.

Created attachment 15475
From current code to fix: "html template" which shows the tree structure/html elements in context to understand the meaning

BPositive produced this for Nikerabbit to comment how he wants the classes and IDs to be named.

Attached:

Yeah, these IDs are quite generic. Can easily clash with things and seem out of place in a MediaWiki context.

Relevant conventions:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Coding_conventions/CSS#Naming

Some reading: http://csswizardry.com/2013/01/mindbemding-getting-your-head-round-bem-syntax/

Even if we don't use that syntax (which I think we should in this case), the mindset of part-of and kind-of is very helpful.

Change 135750 had a related patch set uploaded by BPositive:
ID and class names altered with mw-tpm-sp prefix

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/135750

Change 135750 merged by jenkins-bot:
ID and class names fixed for Special:PageMigration with mw-tpm-sp prefix

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/135750

Assuming fixed, further issues to be reported separately.