Description
Details
- Reference
- bz71616
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T101995 Improvements to the toolbar system | |||
| Open | None | T73616 OOUI: Toolbar menus should use sub-groups with a separator (<hr>?) between them for splitting up longer lists | |||
| Open | Feature | None | T74159 OOUI: Toolbar groups should support sub-groups as items (hierarchical, nested menus) | ||
| Resolved | matmarex | T90815 Implement a way to nest toolbar groups without implementing nesting of toolbar groups |
Event Timeline
This looks like it'd require us to implement either subgroups of some kind, or a way to explicitly order the groups (to be able to insert separators at arbitrary positions).
If we also want sub-headings as shown in the mockup, we probably actually want the subgroup approach. Do we?
(In reply to Bartosz Dziewoński from comment #1)
This looks like it'd require us to implement either subgroups of some kind,
or a way to explicitly order the groups (to be able to insert separators at
arbitrary positions).If we also want sub-headings as shown in the mockup, we probably actually
want the subgroup approach. Do we?
I was thinking sub-groups, yes (hence the title ;-)). I don't think we'd ever actually use headings of sub-groups in practice, but others might.
I am not working on this now and I don't see myself working on this soon, leaving it up for grabs for now.
This was a quick simple non-hierarchical separation concept. I.e., no sub-menus, just one level, but in sections. T74159 included sub-menus, but not sections. The idea was having both.