related: T2295: '''bold text''' glitch when word preceeded by an apostrophe
L'''homme'' est is now parsed well ( L'<i>homme</i> est)
but L'''homme'' est L'''homme'' est turns into L<b>homme<i> est L</b>homme</i> est
Description
Description
Related Objects
Related Objects
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
In my point of view, it would've been better to use something like L<nowiki>'</nowiki>''homme'' est (or L'<nowiki></nowiki>''homme'' est) than to implement all that half-broken hackery from T2295
Comment Actions
Personally I would be inclined to -2 most attempts to "fix" this --- our quote handling is far too baroque already.
Comment Actions
I would advocate for the removal of the workaround from T2295, it would make everything cleaner.