Page MenuHomePhabricator

Highlight blocking team dependencies with 'blocked-on<team>' tags
Closed, ResolvedPublic


Per discussion at the SoS and on the engineering list:

  • Name: 'blocked-on-<team>', for each team
  • Description: Marker tag for blocking dependencies on other teams
  • Type of project: Tag; red ! icon works well graphically

I'm happy to create these if there are no objections.


Event Timeline

GWicke raised the priority of this task from to Needs Triage.
GWicke updated the task description. (Show Details)
GWicke added a project: Project-Admins.
GWicke changed Security from none to None.
GWicke updated the task description. (Show Details)
GWicke added a subscriber: GWicke.
Jdforrester-WMF added a subscriber: Jdforrester-WMF.

Have added a list of each of the teams given a quick scan of previous SoS minutes. Have I got them all?

Qgil triaged this task as High priority.EditedDec 17 2014, 9:51 PM
Qgil added a project: Scrum-of-Scrums.
Qgil added a subscriber: Qgil.

I'm just concerned about goodwilling users and developers adding these tags to tasks unrelated to Scrum-of-Scrums, unaware of this specific process. If all these tags have a clear template description and you don't mind having to triage some occasional task landing accidentally there, I personally see no problem in this request, as long as all these teams are ready to use them actively (which is the case, as you all have agreed on a process).

Pinging @Aklapper, although we are approaching the RT migration period...

Please use a common format for all these projects: tag icon, yellow background, Title Case, dashes between words.

PS: ah, whoever fixed the labels was fast. :)

Please don't create the "blocked on platform" tag. I'm assuming people mean "Blocked on MediaWiki Core" when they say that.

GWicke added a comment.EditedDec 18 2014, 7:02 PM

I went ahead and created the first set of tags.

@Qgil: Your point on adding a clear description is well taken. I added a simple description that emphasizes that it is reserved fur urgent blockers only. I'm sure it can be improved.

Whatever solution we choose can be abused. But hey, I hear people built an encyclopedia by entrusting random strangers with edits. Maybe we can be a bit daring here as well, and re-evaluate if abuse turns out to be a significant problem in practice.

GWicke closed this task as Resolved.Dec 18 2014, 7:30 PM
GWicke claimed this task.

Resolving this request, as the first batch is done.

"Urgent" is not defined.

Nemo_bis removed a subscriber: Nemo_bis.Jan 6 2015, 11:40 PM
Milimetric moved this task from Scheduled to Done on the Scrum-of-Scrums board.Feb 25 2015, 6:56 PM
Restricted Application added a project: Wikidata. · View Herald TranscriptJul 3 2016, 10:28 AM