Page MenuHomePhabricator

All multimedia extensions/systems should have a MW-Vagrant role
Open, LowPublic

Related Objects

StatusSubtypeAssignedTask
OpenNone
ResolvedGilles
ResolvedTgr
ResolvedGilles
ResolvedGilles
ResolvedTgr
ResolvedTgr
Resolvedbrion
ResolvedGilles
ResolvedKizule
ResolvedTgr
ResolvedKizule
ResolvedKizule
ResolvedGilles
Resolvedori
Resolvedori
OpenNone
OpenNone
OpenNone
OpenNone
OpenNone
OpenNone
DeclinedNone
OpenNone
OpenNone
OpenNone
OpenNone
OpenNone
ResolvedGilles
ResolvedGilles
InvalidGilles
DeclinedNone
ResolvedTgr
OpenNone

Event Timeline

Tgr created this task.Jan 30 2015, 3:36 AM
Tgr raised the priority of this task from to Low.
Tgr updated the task description. (Show Details)
Tgr added a subscriber: Tgr.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptJan 30 2015, 3:36 AM
bd808 added a subscriber: bd808.Jan 30 2015, 4:57 AM

This tracking bug makes me very happy.

Should there be a parent task "All supported extensions should have an MW-Vagrant rôle"?

bd808 added a comment.Jan 30 2015, 5:52 AM

Should there be a parent task "All supported extensions should have an MW-Vagrant rôle"?

That would be a great goal but I'm afraid it would be a reprise of T2001: [DO NOT USE] Documentation is out of date, incomplete (tracking) [superseded by #Documentation] in a slightly different form. I'd rather see each WMF product team commit to using MediaWiki-Vagrant and actively supporting their components like the Multimedia team is here.

brion added a subscriber: brion.Jan 30 2015, 5:29 PM
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Matanya. · View Herald TranscriptJun 27 2015, 12:49 AM
Jdforrester-WMF moved this task from Untriaged to Backlog on the Multimedia board.Sep 4 2015, 5:53 PM
Kizule added a subscriber: Kizule.

Should this be done for each extension? If is so, I can create subtask for each extension which no have vagrant role?