Page MenuHomePhabricator

svn.wikimedia.org security certificate expired
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

svn.wikimedia.org
Issued by: RapidSSL CA
Expired: Saturday 31 January 2015

Screen_Shot_2015-02-05_at_11.59.26.png (1,428×876 px, 100 KB)

Event Timeline

Krinkle raised the priority of this task from to High.
Krinkle updated the task description. (Show Details)
Krinkle subscribed.

let's close this as rejected, T86655 is happening instead

Change 195310 had a related patch set uploaded (by Dzahn):
delete svn.wikimedia.org SSL cert

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/195310

Change 195310 abandoned by Dzahn:
delete svn.wikimedia.org SSL cert

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/195310

I just ran into this when someone linked to svn.wm.o in https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/pywikipedia-l/2015-May/009287.html. I understand that we're migrating to phab, but what's the rationale for not renewing the SSL cert?

I just ran into this when someone linked to svn.wm.o in https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/pywikipedia-l/2015-May/009287.html. I understand that we're migrating to phab, but what's the rationale for not renewing the SSL cert?

Added blocker on T98723. We don't need to renew the cert if we just move it's svn viewer behind misc-web-eqiad, which uses the wildcard cert.

I just ran into this when someone linked to svn.wm.o in https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/pywikipedia-l/2015-May/009287.html. I understand that we're migrating to phab, but what's the rationale for not renewing the SSL cert?

Added blocker on T98723. We don't need to renew the cert if we just move it's svn viewer behind misc-web-eqiad, which uses the wildcard cert.

This has been suggested before but that only covers the web-part of it and breaks the actual svn protocol which apparently is still used as well.

ArielGlenn subscribed.

@RobH, I gave this to you since svn can't move behind misc web after all.

RobH removed RobH as the assignee of this task.May 15 2015, 7:40 PM
RobH subscribed.

This is only valid still if T86655 is not valid anymore. As it appears still valid, this would be rejected.

Addition: Only valid for long term, short term I suppose its annoying for folks still using SVN.

However, are we still really wanting to support SVN? It has been on the depreciation list for awhile now, and I think that is why this generally hasn't progressed. (We don't typically take a long time to order a certificate ;)

However, are we still really wanting to support SVN?

No :) It has been removed in T86655

Old SVN URLs now redirect (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T86655#1402012)

svn.wikimedia.org points to general Apache cluster / text-lb for redirects.

So the certificate isn't an issue anymore and can be deleted.

svn.wikimedia.org has address 208.80.154.224
224.154.80.208.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer text-lb.eqiad.wikimedia.org.

Change 220967 had a related patch set uploaded (by Dzahn):
svn: delete svn.wm.org SSL cert

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/220967

Change 220967 merged by Dzahn:
svn: delete svn.wm.org SSL cert

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/220967

Dzahn claimed this task.

deleted cert from public repo, deleted key from private repo, shredd'ed and deleted key from antimony, deleted cert from antimony, delete sites-available/50-svn* from antimony