And there is no space between § and the heading title.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=strunt
strunt - Wiktionary
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/strunt
§Swedish[edit]. §Noun[edit]. strunt n. nonsense; that which is not worth paying attention to. §Declension[edit]. [show ▽]Declension of strunt ...
| Project | Branch | Lines +/- | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mediawiki/core | master | +135 -212 | Emergency remove .mw-headline-anchor | |
| mediawiki/core | wmf/1.25wmf21 | +133 -210 | Emergency remove .mw-headline-anchor |
Change 197424 had a related patch set uploaded (by Krinkle):
Emergency remove .mw-headline-anchor
Change 197424 had a related patch set uploaded (by Krinkle):
Emergency remove .mw-headline-anchor
Please don't. I don't think I'm the only one who finds it immensely useful, especially on large pages.
Change 197428 had a related patch set uploaded (by Krinkle):
Emergency remove .mw-headline-anchor
I'm pretty sure @Krenair was being facetious here. :-)
I have the same question, though: why in "§Swedish[edit]" does the "§" warrant an "unbreak now!" when you can clearly see "[edit]" there as well? I guess the suspicion here is that this change broke Google's parsing? Google is screen-scraping (kind of by its nature), so it can and should expect changes to our markup. Auto-generated search results should not dictate feature development.
That said, I too would support a JavaScript or CSS implementation here, which would likely be cleaner. I guess it's back to T18691: RFC: Section header "share" link.